This article is within the scope of WikiProject Korea, a collaborative effort to build and improve articles related to Korea. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how use this banner, please refer to the documentation.KoreaWikipedia:WikiProject KoreaTemplate:WikiProject KoreaKorea-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink articles
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the ((WikiProject Food and drink)) project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here.
Hi! I noticed that this article, Maejapgwa, seems to have very little content of its own which is not in this article, except for a picture, pronunciation, and a few ingredients. In addition, this article states how to make Maejapgwa, which the Maejapgwa article itself does not. Should Maejapgwa be merged into this article? Thanks! Noah Kastin (talk) 02:54, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
However, the other ingredients are not the same in the two articles.
If someone knows what ingredients maejapgwa actually does contain, then the merge, information transfer, or continuation of the current state of both articles can be decided. Until then, the ingredients conflict may make such efforts difficult.
Thanks for letting me know, Brett Cox! Also thank you for your revision to Maejapgwa, as it added useful information and citations (which the article previously lacked).
By the way, do you think that Maejapgwa should be merged into this article? Although Maejapgwa does now have a lot more information than it did when I initially suggested the merge, the two articles still do have a large overlap. Though merging might not be necessary, it still probably could be done by moving the Maejapgwa article into a paragraph or section of this article, albeit with a few tweaks (such as moving IPA pronunciation out of the infobox and into the relevant paragraph or section).
Thanks again for the notification and article improvements!