GA Review

Passed. Recon rabbit 14:08, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

GA toolbox
Copyvio detector Authorship External links
Reviewing
Templates Criteria Instructions

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: APK (talk · contribs) 08:49, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Reconrabbit (talk · contribs) 16:59, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again, I've read this article through and feel now is as good a time as any to start reviewing it. I did a quick copyedit of the article just beforehand but will bring up the few things that were unclear in the prose here and then start on the rest of the review. Recon rabbit 16:59, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Lead

[edit]

There is a mention of actors dealing with limited space in the lead, but the article doesn't specifically address concerns of this limitation, only the numerous renovations over the years.

Done APK hi :-) (talk) 10:02, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No citations - okay per MOS:LEADCITE. Y

Other prose notes

[edit]

1990s: Before the 1996 season began, Wayside hosted four performances of Always Patsy Cline at John Handley High School, since Wayside's stage was too small for the event. It was the first and only time Wayside acted as hosts of another company's show. This should clarify that Always Patsy Cline wasn't a Wayside production; it's unclear that it was a national/off-broadway production from the information provided.

Done APK hi :-) (talk) 10:02, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

References

[edit]

Some potential copyright violations were identified but are dismissed as they are all pointing towards lengthy quotations. Will keep a look out for close paraphrasing.
allaboutwayside.com is a self-published source, but works well to supplement the information that is there and has been verified by secondary sources as coming from what could be described as an expert in the field.

Source checks

[edit]

Based on this revision:

[1], [2] Y (confirmed from recent Historic District GA)
[4] Y based on google books preview.
[5] ~~N Was the wrong reference used? This is an 1887 photo of high school students.~~
[6], [7] Y
[8] Y
[9] Y
[13] Y
[18] Y
[65] Y
[83] Y
[93] Y
[105] Y
[110] Y
[113] Y
[125] Y
[139] Y
[163] Y
[169] Y
[180] Y
[181] Y

Many offline sources couldn't be checked but are corroborated by allaboutwayside.com.

I corrected the ref #5 issue. APK hi :-) (talk) 08:40, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Images

[edit]

Images are relevant, tagged with the proper licenses and credited to the authors. Y

Good Article review progress box

Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()

3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()

Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.