GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Hi! I'll be reviewing this article, but I've got class in 15 minutes and I have to leave. Give me 2-3 hours and I should have the reviews up...at the MOST I'll have it up by tonight. Cheers, —the_ed1717:46, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:
    B. MoS compliance:
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
    C. No original research:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    B. Focused:
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:


SR 527 was part of the Pacific Highway, also known as State Road 1 in the 1920s,[4] before it became U.S. Route 99 (US 99). The highway that is SR 527 today became part of Secondary State Highway 2A (SSH 2A) in 1937,[5] which was created at the time the rest of the system was created.[5] The current route of SR 527, from Bothell to the newer alignment of the Pacific Highway/US 99, was dropped from SSH 2A in 1943,[6] and was readded as SSH SJ in 1957,[7] which existed until 1964, when a highway renumbering occurred, which created SR 527.[2] The highway itself didn't fully open until October 17, 1969,[8] and since the opening, the highway has become increasingly busy, with about 57,000 motorists using the highway at the interchange with I-405 in 2004.[9] A large construction project started in 1991 and ended in 2006 to widen the highway and put up sound walls along the highway.[10]

I'm putting the article on hold for now to address these issues; if you need any help, don't hesitate to ask! —the_ed1722:25, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

All done. ~~ This page was edited by ĈĠ 01:04, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Any way to copy-edit it? I'm not comfortable passing this with these basic errors...a run through (may not be complete):

Whew! I hope this helps. Cheers! —the_ed1702:08, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I copy-edited it and removed some unnecessary information. Can my nom be next to be reviwed now lol. Grk1011/Stephen (talk) 22:25, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Looks a LOT better. Good job, guys! Cheers, —Ed 17 for President Vote for Ed 22:28, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
So is this article a GA? ~~ This page was edited by ĈĠ 22:31, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Yes. :D —Ed 17 for President Vote for Ed 22:50, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]