This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the WandaVision article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed Article policies Neutral point of view No original research Verifiability

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1, 2, 3Auto-archiving period: 30 days

This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Comics: Marvel B‑class Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! If you would like to participate, you can help with the current tasks, visit the notice board, edit the attached article or discuss it at the project's talk page.ComicsWikipedia:WikiProject ComicsTemplate:WikiProject ComicsComics articles B This article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by Marvel Comics work group. Disney B‑class Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disney, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of The Walt Disney Company and its affiliated companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DisneyWikipedia:WikiProject DisneyTemplate:WikiProject DisneyDisney articles B This article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Television B‑class Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles B This article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. United States: Television B‑class Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles B This article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by American television task force.

This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report 10 times. The weeks in which this happened: January 10 to 16, 2021 (4th) January 17 to 23, 2021 (11th) January 24 to 30, 2021 (6th) January 31 to February 6, 2021 (5th) February 7 to 13, 2021 (6th) February 14 to 20, 2021 (3rd) February 21 to 27, 2021 (2nd) February 28 to March 6, 2021 (1st) March 7 to 13, 2021 (7th) March 14 to 20, 2021 (20th)

The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nuxKgpMx8qI Analysis/reception sources: Rolling Stone, The Atlantic, Variety

view · edit Frequently asked questions Q: Why is the cast section formatted as it is? Specifically, why are there no subsections (Main, Recurring, and Guest) like other TV series articles, and why are Debra Jo Rupp and Fred Melamed in the main bulleted list? A: Marvel Studios is approaching their Disney+ series as if they are feature films (see List of Marvel Cinematic Universe television series § Series approach and this source) in several ways, including how they credit actors for each episode. Unlike conventional television series, WandaVision does not differentiate series regulars, guest stars, and co-stars. Instead, the series has one cast list for each episode during the credits as well as a main on-end title sequence that gives billing to the series' main actors. To represent this, the WandaVision cast section uses a hybrid approach of WP:TVCAST and WP:FILMCAST. Any actor who appears in the main on-end billing is listed in the section's main bulleted list as if they were part of a film poster's "billing block" per FILMCAST, and they are listed in order of first onscreen credit per TVCAST. Additional actors are noted in prose below the main bulleted list as is done in the MCU film articles, with recurring and guest actors included per TVCAST. This was determined by tracking appearances in the series (see Talk:WandaVision/Archive 3 § Cast breakdown), with four or more appearances considered a recurring role and two or more considered a guest role. See past discussions here, here, and here.

This section is pinned and will not be automatically archived until 22:01, 1 August 2021 (UTC).

Breakdown of each episode's main on-end billing, plus cast list. Actors in bold indicate the first appearance of the character, with the episodes they appear in after.

- Favre1fan93 (talk) 16:22, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Adamstom.97 I like the work you did. I'm just looking it over and feeling if we might need to fine tune it a bit more. My main concern is the information about grief, particularly how the series is structured to follow the stages of grief, is not in the "Structure" subsection. But it also works where you have it in the "Character" subsection, so maybe we need to rethink headings? - Favre1fan93 (talk) 20:35, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, definitely happy for other heading options. I was thinking it made sense to have all the grief stuff together, but also happy for other suggestions as well. - adamstom97 (talk) 22:20, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I definitely agree with that, it's just the grief stuff straddles both character info and the structure info in the current set up. I'll try and take a look over it all soon, see if I can come up with another option to consider. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 16:41, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

So other miniseries like The Queen's Gambit, Chernobyl, and Tiger King use the poster as the main image instead of just the logo. Wouldn't it make sense to do the same for this? Especially since there's no Season 1 article to actually place the poster. It just feels off to me that the official poster doesn't make it anywhere on the site.

Also, I know there's pre-established guidelines about the cast list, but some miniseries like The Defenders use the official credit order regardless of first episode appearance. The main cast has a set order (aside from the alternating leads), they just leave out the ones that aren't in that specific episode.

Same conversation applies to The Falcon and the Winter Soldier of course.

You're missing a nomination for the 2021 MTV Movie & TV Awards in Best Musical Moment for the song Agatha All Along . Movieknower59 (talk) 03:37, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Done —El Millo (talk) 03:48, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I mean the fact that two barely even recurring characters get third and fourth billing because they appeared in the first episode in which there were barely any characters besides the two leads, i just think we need to come up with better mother truckin rules tbh, usually it isn't THIS bad but there should be some exceptions when it comes to stuff like this, deep down no one thinks this actually makes sense. 92.24.146.242 (talk) 16:01, 18 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You can always start an WP:RFC. DonQuixote (talk) 16:04, 18 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I mean "original broadcast credits" see Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style under cast order, doesn't specify the individual names credits as being more valid so maybe I think in this case we can work around if enough people agree. 92.24.146.242 (talk) 16:13, 18 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have not very often come across the term "direct set up" when describing the relationship between a film/series and the next film in terms of storyline. Plus, it damns with faint praise by implying that WandaVision does nothing more than set up the Doctor Strange film. I think a rephrasing would make the article clearer. Airbornemihir (talk) 03:01, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]