Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Matthew R Dunn (talk · contribs) 01:13, 2 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'll be conducting the review. -- Matthew RD 01:13, 2 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

1. Well written: See notes below
2. Sources: ✓ Pass
3. Broadness in coverage: ✓ Pass
4. Neutral: ✓ Pass
5. Stability: ✓ Pass
6. Images: ✓ Pass

• "It is written by Mark Gatiss and first broadcast on BBC One on 17 April 2010." No director?
• "Gatiss was not sure what to do with the premise at first, but then became excited about doing a war movie, of which he was fond, and his own Dalek story." Add bolded word.
• "Final consolidated ratings for BBC One were 7.92 million and 381,000 for BBC HD, therefore making the total to? 8.2 million viewers."

I'll put it on hold for seven days (like those minor issues will take that long to fix :P). -- Matthew RD 14:29, 3 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry but "Final consolidated ratings for BBC One were 7.92 million and 381,000 for BBC HD, therefore making the total 8.2 million viewers." makes perfect, logical sense to me as a native English speaker from England, the addition of the word "to" just seems to stop the sentence from scanning properly. Jasonfward (talk) 14:45, 3 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

That's why I added the question mark, I wasn't sure if it made more sense at all. -- Matthew RD 16:25, 3 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Issues fixed! Thanks for the review :) Glimmer721 ^talk 17:09, 3 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No probs. All loks good now so I'll pass it. -- Matthew RD 18:03, 3 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]