This article is on good shape. I have a few comments:
in the lead, should it be "escalation clause"? My understanding is that escalator refers to moving stairs?
It's pretty frequently referred to as the "escalator clause" (frequently in quotes) - see for instance here, here, and here.
in the lead, suggest Congressional refusal to authorise larger battleships"
Good idea
in the lead, suggest a new sentence "Overcrowding was exacerbated by wartime modifications that considerably strengthened their anti-aircraft batteries and significantly increased their crews."
Works for me
month to month ranges use an unspaced endash eg June – September should be June–September
Good catch
if it is necessary to use LT, it should be introduced first
Do you mean with a link? Ships during the treaty system (and since, as far as I know) routinely used long tons, as that was what the treaties specified
suggest "2,500. officers and enlisted"
Done
state in the body that the 20 mm mounts were single mounts
Done
rounding difference between body and infobox for the turret armour
quad is a bit colloquial, suggest using quadruple throughout
Yeah, I was hoping to avoid the repetition of "quadruple mount"
link ship commissioning
Done
I take it Alabama was not the flagship of TF 61?
Curiously, that was the cruiser Tuscaloosa - you'd think he'd have wanted one of the battleships, since they had been built specifically as flagships and a 35,000-ton battleship probably weathers the North Atlantic better than a 10,000-ton cruiser.
when it says "The fleet then returned to Majuro" do you mean task group? There is another instance of this.
No, all of TF 38/58
ranks for the Japanese admirals?
Added
"before South Dakota and the rest of TF 34" should this be Alabama?
Indeed
link Kyushu
Done
link USS Indiana and Massachusetts
Done
link Kamaishi, Iwate
Done
"the longest tow of a vessel"
Whoops
do we know the source of File:ONI identification image South Dakota class battleship.jpg?
Added a link
do we know the source of the information on File:Leyte map annotated.jpg?
Don't feel like bothering to poke the uploader, so I'll replace it with the essentially identical official US Army drawing from Dougie Mac's report on the campaign
This article is well-written, verifiable using reliable sources, covers the subject well, is neutral and stable, contains no plagiarism, and is illustrated by appropriately licensed images with appropriate captions. Passing. Nice work! Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 22:51, 7 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]