Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Hahc21 (talk · contribs) 22:49, 21 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Review
- Prose
- I did a check and everything seems fine. I find the prose particularly good for this type of articles, and it is up to standard.
- Broadness
- Very broand and detailed. Good.
- Images
- All of them are from commons, and have correct captions.
- Verifiable
- Yes. Some of the links are for subscribers only, but due to a past interaction woth the nom, I am happy to assume the facts as true.
- Result