Tropical Storm Chris (1988) has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria . If you can improve it further, please do so . If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it .Article milestones Date Process Result July 9, 2012 Good article nominee Listed
It had a whole host of errors relating to the Atlantic Basin, even claiming that the name Larry had been used by the year 2000 (it had not), and transporting a tropical cyclone back in time two months in 1893. If you want to check out several of its reviews (including an old one by myself), click here . Thegreatdr 18:52, 15 August 2006 (UTC) [ reply ]
Whoa... that one was rough! I wonder how our articles would fare in a WikiReader ...? Tito xd (?!? ) 02:32, 16 August 2006 (UTC) [ reply ]
Well consequely, some of our artiles have that Longshore Encyclopedia as a source. Storm05 14:07, 16 August 2006 (UTC) [ reply ] This review is transcluded from Talk:Tropical Storm Chris (1988)/GA1 . The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review. Reviewer: MathewTownsend (talk · contribs ) 14:46, 9 July 2012 (UTC) [ reply ]
review I've made a few minor editors that you're free to change:[1]
Otherwise, everything checks out. Good work!
GA review-see WP:WIAGA for criteria (and here for what they are not)
Is it reasonably well written ?
a. prose: clear and concise , respects copyright laws , correct spelling and grammar:
b. complies with MoS for lead , layout , words to watch , fiction , and list incorporation :
Is it factually accurate and verifiable ?
a. provides references to all sources in the section(s) dedicated to footnotes/citations according to the guide to layout :
b. provides in-line citations from reliable sources where necessary:
c. no original research :
Is it broad in its coverage ?
a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic:
b. it remains focused and does not go into unnecessary detail (see summary style ):
Does it follow the neutral point of view policy .
fair representation without bias:
Is it stable ?
no edit wars , etc:
Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
a. images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales :
b. images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions :
Overall :
Pass or Fail:
Pass!
Pass! Congratulations. MathewTownsend (talk ) 22:41, 9 July 2012 (UTC) [ reply ]