This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Tripartite Struggle article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Pratihara were gurjar not rajput 2409:4056:EB7:57BA:C99E:F5D4:6CA9:45B8 (talk) 04:57, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 05:07, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
@Utcursch: While the article has this line -> "This tripartite struggle for Kannauj lingered for almost two centuries and ultimately ended in favour of the Gurjara-Pratihara
" since this edit of 2012, the source [1] in its page 283 specifically writes : "Rastrakuta achieved a complete truimph". Please see. I have for now cn tagged that particular line. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 16:21, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
The article should include relevant information on the dynasties involved in the struggle, with the Occupation of Kannauj by Dharmapala, which started it, to the conquest by Mihir Bhoja, which ended the struggle. The view of Historians should go after the main body. weakening of the Rashtrakuta dynasty should come after the triumph of Mihir Bhoja following the historical timeline.Maglorbd (talk) 09:37, 29 January 2024 (UTC)