This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical music, which aims to improve, expand, copy edit, and maintain all articles related to classical music, that are not covered by other classical music related projects. Please read the guidelines for writing and maintaining articles. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details.Classical musicWikipedia:WikiProject Classical musicTemplate:WikiProject Classical musicClassical music articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New York City-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York CityWikipedia:WikiProject New York CityTemplate:WikiProject New York CityNew York City articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
A fact from Toby Saks appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 6 August 2013 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
Both the Seattle Times and the Seattle Woman Magazine you quote as your sources refer to Ms Saks as the "third woman member" of the New York Philharmonic Orchestra, not the "third female member". As a woman (not female) professional, speaking on behalf of all the women I know who would find the term "female" offensive, I am asking you to change the term in both the article and the hook. You are far from alone in using female in this way, in fact it's becoming pervasive, but it's still unfortunate. Thanks, Awien (talk) 17:56, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
My Oxford English Dictionary does not list an adjectival usage of "woman". Nobody says "a man member". The word "woman" is a noun. For hundreds of years the adjectival form has been "female" or "womanly". Speaking on behalf of all the women I know who would find politikal korrectniz offensive, I am asking you to stop debasing the English language in the promotion of trendy opinion and currenty-fashionable idiocy Captainbeefart (talk) 08:58, 6 August 2013 (UTC).[reply]
Captainbeefart, given your tone, I wasn’t going to bother responding, but I have decided after all to give you the benefit of the doubt.
Firstly, a dictionary is neither a grammar nor a style guide. In English syntax, there is no problem whatsoever with a noun modifying a noun (it’s called apposition). Here are a handful of examples from a list that could be endless: floor tile, school bus, coffee cup, glass ceiling, closet door . . . standard English, not ungrammatical in the slightest.
As for “woman” used as a modifier, William Safire notes here: [2] that the usage dates back to 1300, and quotes Dryden’s “woman grammarian” from 1697.
But significant numbers of women in the professions really only dates back to the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, so that is how far back we can look at the terminology used in referring to them.
So a search via Google Engram comparing the frequency of woman vs female doctor, lawyer, and professor shows woman far ahead overall throughout the twentieth century until a sudden spike in female professor in the last ten years:
Nobody says a man member (or a male member either) because until far too recently, members were assumed to be men. It’s when a woman breaks that sex barrier that we need to specify that she was a pioneering woman member - which, moreover, is what she’s called in both the sources quoted.
The page has been worded better. If you choose to continue this discussion, please do so on your own talkpages or an MOS talkpage. Thank you. — Wyliepedia06:03, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The information has been removed, but that is what the source stated. Where I'm from, we sometimes get phone calls confirming such news. Her family may have been around her then. That type of cancer works quickly. — Wyliepedia06:06, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]