This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Novels: Fantasy Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.NovelsWikipedia:WikiProject NovelsTemplate:WikiProject Novelsnovel articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by Fantasy task force.

The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future: Interview with Scott Lynch by Alison Bone for The Bookseller, 10 April 2006. Interview with Scott Lynch by Pat's Fantasy Hotlist, 21 June 2006. Video Interview with Scott Lynch on YouTube, 21 July 2006. Interview with Scott Lynch by Elbakin.net, 7 August 2006. Interview with Scott Lynch by Katharine Stubbs for Sentient Online, 21 September 2009. Scott Lynch: Audible Sessions: Exclusive Interview by Audible, 30 November 2016 Review by J. K. Pelletier FantasyBookNews.com, December 2008 Review by Jayaprakash on kvltsite.com August 2007 Review by C.M. Morrison Strange Horizon, 26 June 2006 Review by John Berlyne SFRevu, June 2006 Review by Sherwood Smith The SF Site, 2006 Review by Pat's Fantasy Hotlist 29 May 2006 Review by Sue Griffiths Fiction Reviews, 2006 Review by Dylan Skerbitz Twin Cities Daily Planet, 5 September 2006 Review by Williams Lexner Reviews of Speculative Fiction for the Fan and Collector, 2 July 2006 Review by Violet Kane Alternative Reality Webzine, 2006 Review by Ilya Popov 6 February 2006 Review by Martin Jenner August 1, 2006 Computercrowsnest.com Review by Pawel Raczek May 5, 2008

• A character summary is required for this article, dealing with the main and secondary characters, as I feel not enough information is given on certain characters- for example the Thiefmaker is mentioned in the initial paragraph of the plot summary, but no information is given as to who he is and his interactions with the main characters is not shown in any real depth. The addition of this would aid the reader in understanding the article better in a greater depth.

• In general the plot summary could do with a little expanding in a few areas-no mention is made to tell the reader of this article how Locke meets and befriends Jean Tannen-though the overall length of this portion is sufficient. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wyrmalla (talk • contribs) 02:29, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

--- The paragraph on criticism: There is a link to one critical review, no links to other reviews, and several links to responses on the first mentioned review. The problem with the latter links is that the responses do not really deal with the book but with a specific sentence in the first review that is not really related to the book. So perhaps they are not the best choice of "links to texts on this book".90.190.225.121 (talk) 10:42, 26 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

--- The character Gray King/Grey King has been spelled with both variants in the article. There needs to be a spelling consistent with the books. Apoorv020 (talk) 18:52, 23 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Should this be a section within the article on the first book of the sequence. The information is already given on the author's page. Schizocarp (talk) 14:28, 4 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Removed this section from main page per WP:EL. Added here in case someone would like to add a Reception section in future. Nikthestunned 16:23, 6 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I've moved these potential sources up into a ((Refideas)) template so they are not archived before they can be examined and possibly used in the article. Thanks.— TAnthony^Talk 16:34, 6 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

http://gentlemenbastards.com/films/

Information from this site and associated links could be used to update the very out of date information about the film. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.33.220.219 (talk) 00:28, 4 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]