GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Tezero (talk · contribs) 22:47, 23 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Do they give out "worst boxart of the year" awards in gaming? Yeesh. Not only should that be free-use; they should pay us to use it. Tezero (talk) 22:47, 23 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Good Article review progress box
Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()
3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

Be back for the rest later. Tezero (talk) 22:47, 23 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

That should be fine for GA. Ping me when addressed. Tezero (talk) 21:57, 24 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about the wait! I was kept away by Christmas festivities... and fanfiction. I'll go through the GA rituals now. Tezero (talk) 01:44, 26 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]