![]() | Sultanate of Bijapur is currently a World history good article nominee. Nominated by Flemmish Nietzsche (talk) at 19:20, 17 July 2024 (UTC) An editor has indicated a willingness to review the article in accordance with the good article criteria. Further reviews are welcome from any editor who has not contributed significantly to this article (or nominated it), and can be added to the review page, but the decision whether or not to list the article as a good article should be left to the first reviewer. Short description: Indian kingdom in the Deccan (1490–1686) |
![]() | This ![]() It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
After visiting pages of Delhi sultanate and Bahmani Sultanate, I had seen some space in Deccan Sultanates and this page. So I added info box containing former countries. Hope readers made appreciate. Muhammad Aslam Razvi
IN the interests of a complete survey of Bijapur, I would suggest more data be added on the impact of the Portuguese arrival in India, and the struggle over Goa. We know that Bijapur was deeply involved in both diplomatic and trade relations with the Portuguese from 1510 CE on. 98.193.56.181 (talk) 16:11, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
I have just added below mentioned articles relating to different sections of Adilshahis of Bijapur.
2 Sufis of Bijapur
3 Bijapur; The Great Metropolis Of The Medieval Deccan
4 Palmyra of the Deccan
5 Population and Suburbs
6 Elaborate Water System
7 Bazaars and Petes
8 Foreign Accounts
9 Gardens and Water Pavilions
10 Education and Learning
11 Medical Aids and Darush-Shafa (Hospitals)
12 Abode of Music
13 Unprecedented Art and Architecture
14 Conclusion
15 Adil Shahi arts and heritage
16 Adil Shahis of Bijapur
I feel it is my job to provide maximum of information about Bijapur city. Muhammad Aslam Razvi
I appreciate your additions to the Adil Shahi page, but feel that you have added far too many materials that really are not directly pertinent to the history of the Adil Shahi per se, but to the city of Bijapur in general. I would like to recommend that these sections all be moved to the wiki article about Bijapur.
1. 2 Sufis of Bijapur 2. 3 Some of the notable Sufis of Bijapur 3. 4 Bijapur; The Great Metropolis Of The Medieval Deccan 4. 5 Palmyra of the Deccan 5. 6 Population and Suburbs 6. 7 Elaborate Water System 7. 8 Bazaars and Petes 8. 9 Foreign Accounts 9. 10 Gardens and Water Pavilions 10. 11 Education and Learning 11. 12 Medical Aids and Darush-Shafa (Hospitals) 12. 13 Abode of Music 13. 14 Unprecedented Art and Architecture 14. 15 Conclusion
The article about the Adil Shahi should contain specific, primary information about the that dynasty, nothing else. If you would like to go back and add specific information related to each ruler, that would be acceptable.Jemiljan (talk) 04:10, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
I have added some observations and references made by the scholar T.N. Devare that greatly clarifies and enhances our understanding of Yusuf Adil Shah, and provides clear proof that contradicts the fictitious, albeit very popular account by Firishta of of Yusuf's Ottoman origins.--Jemiljan 21:16, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 17:12, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
![]() |
An image used in this article, File:Sultan Ibrahim Adil Shah II.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests April 2012
Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.
To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Sultan Ibrahim Adil Shah II.jpg) This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 14:53, 11 April 2012 (UTC) |
Böri (talk) 11:14, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
can someone help me whit reference! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.209.191.74 (talk) 15:36, 8 August 2014 (UTC)
Any comments on this edit? Can someone comment on what is going on, or provide a source for the information? User:Moinkm5, you'll receive a notification of this discussion. Thanks. Skittle (talk) 11:10, 9 August 2014 (UTC)
There was not always Shiya Muslims, it changed often, but finally sunni islam was the state religion in the family.
as you can see by the different shahs... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.46.105.20 (talk) 20:41, 27 November 2014 (UTC)
The Source is here under http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ibrahim_Adil_Shah_II
Under Religion you see: Shia till 1552 and accepted SunniIslam in the hands of Shah Sibghatullah Shuttari and Sunnism became the official religion of Bijapur Adil Shahi Dynasty — Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.46.105.20 (talk) 15:36, 28 November 2014 (UTC)
--88.233.7.216 (talk) 01:12, 29 June 2016 (UTC) Was A Turk
Just a question: What does “Palmyra of the Deccan” mean?
I've been to Palmyra, the desert city in Syria with its half Roman, half pre-Islamic Arab ruins, back in 1992. It also was famous in that the ancient temples resembled the more ancient Jewish temple of Jerusalem (destroyed by the Romans in AD 70). Most of the ruins were destroyed in the Syria war later on. Palmyra also was infamous for its prison, where the Asads kept most of their political prisoners.
But Palmyra as a symbol for a multicultural society that supported poets freely is entirely alien to me. Where do you have that from? Greetings, Curryfranke (talk) 13:05, 27 June 2018 (UTC)
What does 'some of them attained high order' mean, exactly? Doesn't read well in English at all. Please elaborate, whomever edited. Thanks. 50.111.52.253 (talk) 03:58, 6 June 2021 (UTC)
the Deccan Sultanates were all adherent of Shi'a Islam, they all knew how to complete masterpiece artworks in just 12 colour.
21:23, 10 April 2024 (UTC)21:23, 10 April 2024 (UTC)21:23, 10 April 2024 (UTC)21:23, 10 April 2024 (UTC)137.59.145.217 (talk) 21:23, 10 April 2024 (UTC)\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\21:23, 10 April 2024 (UTC)21:23, 10 April 2024 (UTC)137.59.145.217 (talk) 21:23, 10 April 2024 (UTC)\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\21:23, 10 April 2024 (UTC)~
The result of the move request was: moved. Consensus that titling these articles after the sultanates would improve titling consistency across the articles on the Deccan sultanates. Retitling these articles after the sultanates, rather than adjusting the other sultanates' articles to be named for the ruling dynasties, was identified as providing more clarity on the articles' scope. (closed by non-admin page mover) ModernDayTrilobite (talk • contribs) 16:21, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
– These articles are about the states themselves, the Sultanates, not the dynasties. We should also standardize whether the Deccan Sultanates are titled by their dynastic or geographical name, and the geographical name makes more sense here both for what these articles are actually about for what a reader would actually search. The other two Deccan Sultanates are already titled for their geographic-based names (Ahmadnagar Sultanate and Bidar Sultanate). The first and third pages to be moved have the "Sultanate" first as that is what seems to be more common per ngram [1] [2] Flemmish Nietzsche (talk) 10:21, 30 June 2024 (UTC) — Relisting. ModernDayTrilobite (talk • contribs) 13:44, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
@Flemmish Nietzsche, your recent addition added a bunch of sfn references to Eaton (2009), which is not present in the source list. Could you either add it or change the sfns (if they're a typo for a different Eaton book)? Thanks, Wham2001 (talk) 11:55, 13 July 2024 (UTC)
Hello @Flemmish Nietzsche, I do not see much of a reason to have a list of the sultans in this article and then have a separate article listing nearly no additional info other than a family tree. I say we should either merge that article here or do away with the section in this article completely as there already a link to that article in the infobox. PadFoot (talk) 13:35, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Nominator: Flemmish Nietzsche (talk · contribs) 19:20, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
Reviewer: TrangaBellam (talk · contribs) 12:36, 8 August 2024 (UTC)
I have replaced the incorrect map with the appropriate one from Joseph E Schwartzberg's "A Historical atlas of South Asia" from the University of Chicago. That map along with the exact reference was on here for a long while till the [of April 2024] when a certain User "Kemilliogolgi" replaced it with one he created on his own. He based his "map" on some book written by an ex-IAS (Indian Administrative Service) officer SK Sinha who was "Director of Commerce and Export Promotion" in the Indian state of Andhra Pradesh. The author appears NOWHERE as ANY scholar of remotely any repute. The book is a 1968 publication and also appears nowhere as a scholarly work and probably was not intended to be too. There is no map in the book let alone mentioning the period for the alleged "peak" of its extent. The map created by this indefinitely suspended user stretched the extent of this kingdom way too much to the South compared to the Schwartzberg map. Encyclopedia Brittanica mentions Mysore as its Southernmost limit for the brief peak period and Mysore is significantly to the North of the two Southernmost states of Tamilnad and Kerala. Further fwiiw right here on Wiki neither the "History of Kerala" nor the "History of Tamil Nadu" pages mention bijapur even once. Through the end-March to April to early-May period the various socks of this fraudster made a slew of edits including sneaking in this incorrect dubious and vague map with vice typical of their ilk. The original user was one "AdityaNakul" and they also had other socks named "DeepstoneV" and "Hassan Ganju" among others. On 2024 April 17th that they tucked in this map they made multiple edits right here using three different socks within a few hours of each other. Whichever other information I have been able to look up the Mysore area appears to be the Southernmost limit of bijapur and that is what the Schwartzberg map also shows along with Gingee Fort in the Southeast (for the 28 year period of 1649-77). I will take this to the Admins if the wrong map is put back. 117.194.193.211 (talk) 05:02, 11 August 2024 (UTC)