This article is within the scope of WikiProject Berkshire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Berkshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BerkshireWikipedia:WikiProject BerkshireTemplate:WikiProject BerkshireBerkshire articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject River Thames, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.River ThamesWikipedia:WikiProject River ThamesTemplate:WikiProject River ThamesRiver Thames articles
I would say no. No we don't. I have been bold in the past and removed it but it came back. Granted I did indicate to the editor involved that whilst I think a minor planning dispute is of little note and does not deserve wiki space, it was something I was not prepared to edit war over. S/he perhaps took this to be an endorsement of the content. It was not. Nancy talk17:23, 5 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I have added a new image to commons of the church interior.
but have erred in naming it. Could someone who understands how, rename it more appropriately and if considered suitable add it to the article. I prefer not to add my own images and in this instance one image of the exterior is probably enough and it could wait until there is an article on the church.SovalValtos (talk) 17:27, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I researched this a few days ago Murgatroyd49 and I thought I had answered. Obviously not. I am pre-occupied in real life. I am confident it was the church in Streatley, not one in Goring. I have now tried to request a rename in commons; the first time I have tried the process so I hope correctly. Thank you for your guidance. Looking at the article there is not much text on the church to illustrate so I will still leave it to others to decide whether my photo should be in the article.SovalValtos (talk) 19:01, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]