Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: Ippantekina (talk · contribs) 10:16, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Brachy0008 (talk · contribs) 01:45, 26 July 2024 (UTC) Drop everything now. Because everybody's favourite GA reviewer is here!^{[citation needed]} Will this review be the best thing that's ever been mine? Will the story of this review end soon? It all depends on the nominator, lol. But one thing's for sure, I won't be drunk and grumbling about the quality of article? But anyways, good luck, cos I see sparks fly whenever I see this article.[reply]

Violation unlikely (35.8%). But I managed to see some copyvios though, so here they are:

• Paraphrase keen understanding of what fuels fan obsession in the first place: a desire for intimacy between singer and listener

• Taylor Swift (6820735620).jpg is clear, but TayTay is in a bad angle.

• FN 1: Formatting is a bit werid. Also why is there an information for the value of the box office value in "2023 dollars"?

• FN 10: No mention of Singapore.
• FN 12: Not archived.
• FN 13, 15-16, 18-20: Are they reliable?
• FN 14 is unreliable.

• FN 21 may not be reliable.
• What does FN 19, 27-28 say?
• What does FN 32 say?
• FN 36: Unarchived, speaks NOT about the B-stage