Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
This article was brought to GA status way back in 2010, and since then many of the site's standards and guidelines have changed. After providing some minor cleanup and attempts to fix some of my issues with it, there's still just too many for me to handle and I do not think it meets the GA criteria, or is even a B-class page. There are three main issues I have:
There's some other problems here too, such as its usage of questionable sources (which I've started removing), a lead that makes zero mention of critical reception, and references with inconsistent dates. Like a lot of GAs from that time period, I don't feel it meets the criteria anymore. Namcokid47 (Contribs) 01:03, 27 November 2020 (UTC)