This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 |
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Gilderien (talk · contribs) 17:23, 2 January 2013 (UTC)
Please adress the concerns raised by User:Stone:
General characteristics.
--Stone (talk) 18:17, 25 December 2012 (UTC)
Also the lead should not contain material and thus does not need citations - could these been removed and the material moved/copied to the body with them?--Gilderien Chat|List of good deeds 18:22, 2 January 2013 (UTC)
As it has been a week with no improvements I have to fail this sorry.--Gilderien Chat|List of good deeds 22:13, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
With the unveiling of Dragon V2 last month, the different design, systems, and capabilities supports a restructuring of this article into at least two (maybe three) different articles. I'm detailing below my thoughts on a three article breakout (the names are just a rough sketch):
1) Dragon (spacecraft family) - Essentially a streamlined version of the lead of this article with a summary of the different spacecraft designs the evolve under the Dagon umbrella, with links to the detailed articles for each spacecraft. 2) Dragon V1 - Details the design, capabilities and history of the cargo version. 3) Dragon V2 - Details the design, capabilities and history of the crewed version.
Until recently, it sounded like the only real difference that V2 would bring to the table is life-support systems and seats (to grossly over simplify this...), but it's clear that we're really now dealing with two very different spacecraft based on a shared platform. Since the V2 is yet to fly, I'm open to keeping the article as is until flight tests begin, but it's my opinion that we have enough to support multiple articles at this point. Just wanted to field opinions before taking any drastic action. Hiberniantears (talk) 14:14, 28 June 2014 (UTC)
Mars One has not contracted SpaceX, and the section is missing reliable current citations. I'm deleting it, again. Do not replace it unless there are very good quality citations, and not from Mars One, but a source such as CBS News, Spaceflight Now, or NASAspaceflight.com. SpaceX has said it has not been contacted, and certainly has not signed any contracts with Mars One.--Abebenjoe (talk) 19:09, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
@2601:204:cd00:d630:800d:25fb:9c71:d31d, Gaelan, Abebenjoe, Craigboy, N2e, and Spencerian: Sorry about so many names, just sending to everyone who might have an opinion. I propose that the Mars One section of this article be removed in its entirety. There are no reliable sources linking SpaceX with Mars One, and SpaceX has stated they have no relationship with the Mars One project. Therefore, I believe that content on Mars One in this article is irrelevant. Each of the other proposals are clearly linked, with reliable sources, to SpaceX. For example, a report cited in this article on Red Dragon states "The SpaceX capsule, he said, would be used to take people to low-earth orbit; SpaceX would have most of the capabilities needed to put material on Mars. He reported that SpaceX developers had been thinking along these lines." Mars One clearly has no relationship with SpaceX unlike all other cited projects. Appable (talk) 03:57, 23 December 2015 (UTC)
-- I have removed the entry several times now and someone keeps putting it back. Mars One are not being taken seriously by anyone. They are not an aerospace company, they are no more than a bad joke. Their relationship with SpaceX is non-existent nor could they ever afford to work with them. It's insulting to even take the company seriously, and it bears no relevance to SpaceX or the Dragon Spacecraft so it's a mystery as to why someone keeps adding it unless they are associated with Mars One. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:204:CD00:D630:44E2:810D:F8AD:8D23 (talk) 13:45, 23 December 2015 (UTC)
Dragon editors may wish to comment on this global move discussion. — JFG talk 10:24, 18 August 2016 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: Moved — Amakuru (talk) 14:38, 1 November 2016 (UTC)
Dragon (spacecraft) → SpaceX Dragon – WP:NATURALDAB and "SpaceX" is shorter than "(spacecraft)". The term "SpaceX Dragon" is also frequently used [1][2][3] so is a pretty commonly encountered formulation. This would match other commercial products from other companies which are not primary topics, such as Ford Mustang, IBM Personal Computer, Boeing 747, Sega Genesis, etc -- 65.94.171.217 (talk) 14:53, 22 October 2016 (UTC)
*'''Support'''
or *'''Oppose'''
, then sign your comment with ~~~~
. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's policy on article titles.Is this capsule reusable? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.63.77.142 (talk) 17:47, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
http://www.spacex.com/news/2017/02/27/spacex-send-privately-crewed-dragon-spacecraft-beyond-moon-next-year quotes Elon as saying:
"SpaceX is currently contracted to perform an average of four Dragon 2 missions to the ISS per year, three carrying cargo and one carrying crew."
While it doesn't clear up the naming issue, it does clear up that cargo flights to the ISS are going to use a Dragon 2-based capsule. Greg (talk) 01:24, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
I suggest that the List of Dragon missions section be split off into a separate article. I suggest the new article be called List of SpaceX Dragon missions. This would be comparable to the Falcon 9 mission list at List of Falcon 9 and Falcon Heavy launches and complementary to that. -- 65.94.169.56 (talk) 17:51, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
*'''Support'''
or *'''Oppose'''
, then sign your comment with ~~~~
. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's policy on article titles.Hello JFG and Sario528, I was the one who changed the name "Dragon 2" to "Crew Dragon" in the SpaceX_Dragon and Dragon 2 pages. The reason was that the http://www.spacex.com/crew-dragon page only mentioned the name "Crew Dragon" and not "Dragon 2" (anymore). SMApers (talk) 21:54, 31 July 2017 (UTC)
Is the logo featured here [5] the (cargo) Dragon logo, and if so, then it should appear on this page (if a cleaner version of the logo is found) -- 70.51.46.15 (talk) 08:10, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 17 external links on SpaceX Dragon. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
((dead link))
tag to http://www.aviationweek.com/aw/generic/story.jsp?id=news%2FCOTS09209.xml&channel=awstWhen you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template ((source check))
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:55, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
Which spacecraft will be used? A refurbished Dragon version 1 or a Dragon version 2 vehicle? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.83.235.194 (talk) 10:48, 23 November 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on SpaceX Dragon. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template ((source check))
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:41, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on SpaceX Dragon. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
((dead link))
tag to http://www.floridatoday.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=2013307030023When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template ((source check))
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:02, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: consensus confirming the current title, per the discussion below. Dekimasuよ! 01:52, 19 February 2018 (UTC)
SpaceX Dragon → Dragon (spacecraft) – The article was moved from Dragon (spacecraft) to the current title in November 2016, following a poorly-attended move request which did not establish consensus. (Dear Amakuru, let me WP:TROUT you belatedly for this premature close.) The titling guidelines at WP:SPACENAME clearly discourage listing a manufacturer name in front of a spacecraft or rocket name: we have Falcon 9, not SpaceX Falcon 9, and Cygnus (spacecraft), not Orbital ATK Cygnus. Heck, SpaceX Dragon is even listed in WP:SPACENAME as an example of what not to do! I therefore request to move the title back to the standard form Dragon (spacecraft). — JFG talk 15:40, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
Has the production of the Dragon version 1 ended? How many Dragen version 1 were produced? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.75.231.134 (talk) 07:28, 4 April 2018 (UTC)
Seems to me that the table should include payload mass and downmass also. Nergaal (talk) 08:34, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
I would like to see undocking date and/or de-orbit date included. AncientBrit (talk) 16:35, 3 September 2019 (UTC) (talk) 16:32, 3 September 2019 (UTC)
173.52.238.41 (talk) 21:34, 24 April 2019 (UTC)
Mission | Payload | Downmass | Ref |
---|---|---|---|
CRS-1 | 882 pounds (400 kg) | 1,673 pounds (759 kg) | [6] |
CRS-2 | 1,493 pounds (677 kg) | 3,020 pounds (1,370 kg) | [7] |
CRS-3 | Example | Example | Example |
CRS-4 | Example | Example | Example |
CRS-5 | Example | Example | Example |
CRS-6 | Example | Example | Example |
CRS-7 | Example | Example | Example |
CRS-8 | Example | Example | Example |
CRS-9 | Example | Example | Example |
CRS-10 | Example | Example | Example |
CRS-11 | Example | Example | Example |
CRS-12 | Example | Example | Example |
CRS-13 | Example | Example | Example |
CRS-14 | Example | Example | Example |
CRS-15 | Example | Example | Example |
CRS-16 | Example | Example | Example |
CRS-17 | Example | Example | Example |
A list of all the Dragon spacecraft produced with: the type (Dragon 1, Dragon 2), the number of times they have gone into orbit, the number of person transported to the ISS, the date of the first and last mission, and the final disposition of the spacecraft itself (i.e. destroyed, stored, displayed at museum, etc.)
user:mnw2000 10:29, 17 April 2020 (UTC)
I searched through SpaceX job offers and although some mention Javascript those that are for Dragon don't. Until there is no official information about the dragon's stack I don't think you can say the GUI is made with JS. --Nux (talk) 22:00, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
The article header-text claims: "This article is about the original Cargo Dragon. For Crew Dragon, see Dragon 2..." but the article talks about the Commercial Crew program and the D2 development. Then the missions table only lists D1 missions. The article seems to want to be a general summary but also D1-only. Pick a side. Either the Red-Dragon and D2-specific material needs to be moved/merged to their respective articles and this made a pure D1 article, or else the D1-specific material needs its own article and this article becomes a summary article for all-Dragon-variants-and-history. -- PaulxSA (talk) 09:16, 1 June 2020 (UTC)
There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Dragon 2 which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 08:36, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Dragon 1. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 July 20#Dragon 1 until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Soumya-8974 talk contribs subpages 11:29, 20 July 2020 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect SpaceX Cargo Dragon. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 July 20#SpaceX Cargo Dragon until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Soumya-8974 talk contribs subpages 11:30, 20 July 2020 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Dragon One. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 July 20#Dragon One until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Soumya-8974 talk contribs subpages 11:31, 20 July 2020 (UTC)
(RfC withdrawn) The current issue with this article is whether the article should be about a class of cargo spacecraft used from SpaceX COTS Demo Flight 1 to SpaceX CRS-20 or a class of spacecraft which evolved from a cargo spacecraft to a crewed spacecraft. --Soumya-8974 talk contribs subpages 06:14, 27 June 2020 (UTC)