 | Shep (sculpture) has been listed as one of the Art and architecture good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: June 28, 2024. (Reviewed version). |
 | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | A fact from Shep (sculpture) appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 6 May 2024 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
Did you know nomination
[edit]- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by PrimalMustelid talk 11:28, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
( )
- ... that the replacement of a semipalmated sandpiper sculpture named Shep in New Brunswick led to a $19,000 investigation over code of conduct violations? Source: https://globalnews.ca/news/10317827/tantramar-bird-sculpture-third-party-report/
Created by B3251 (talk).
Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 6 past nominations.
Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.B3251 (talk) 20:46, 9 April 2024 (UTC).
Article is new enough and long enough, has no apparent issues, and I like it. My one question is if the hook might be better if it included a direct link to both Shep and the semipalmated sandpiper sculpture? So something like this: ... that the replacement of a semipalmated sandpiper sculpture named Shep in New Brunswick led to a $19,000 investigation over code of conduct violations? If you prefer the original, there is nothing wrong with it and we can go with that, but I think providing the link to the type of bird for curious readers is fun. What do you think? Malinaccier (talk) 01:25, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
- Sure, I just modified the hook. B3251 (talk) 03:37, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
GA Review
[edit]The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Shep (sculpture)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Nominator: B3251 (talk · contribs) 00:09, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
Reviewer: PCN02WPS (talk · contribs) 22:34, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Lead and infobox
- The article doesn't mention that the statue is dedicated to the Bay, just that it was named after it, though the infobox says the former
Description
- "The sculpture is considered by locals" → I know this is picky, but the source at the end of this sentence describes only one local that says this
History
- "2001, for Dorchester's inaugural" → remove comma
- "4.0 metres (13.1 ft), and was referred" → remove comma
- "world's largest sandpiper."" → move full stop outside quotes per MOS:LQ
- "Dorchester village council" → if this is the council's name, it should have caps
- "at a cost of $9,300" → is this CAD or USD?
- "by residents, but caused controversy" → remove comma
- "Former Dorchester council member Wiggins-Colwell" → feels weird to me to qualify her as mayor first and then as former council member later
- "municipality $19,167.11" → I can appreciate specificity, but I think you'd be fine to just say $19,167
- "procedures and bylaws."" → same as above per LQ
That's what I've got. PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 22:34, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
- Hi @PCN02WPS, thanks for the review. Looking at the sources, it doesn't appear that the council is named "Dorchester Village Council" and rather refers to its council as a village council, so I left that. Otherwise, all changes have been made. B3251(talk) 23:59, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.