This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Business Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article has been marked as needing immediate attention. Computing: Software High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Software (assessed as Top-importance). This article has been marked as needing immediate attention. An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article. Software: Computing High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Software, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of software on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SoftwareWikipedia:WikiProject SoftwareTemplate:WikiProject Softwaresoftware articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Computing. This article has been marked as needing immediate attention. An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

It is requested that a video clip or video clips be included in this article to improve its quality.

It is requested that an image or photograph of SAP ERP be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible. The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Since I have been redirected from mySAP to this page I would have expected at least to find the word in the article. Unfortunately, this is not the case ... --82.135.125.90 08:25, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I propose that SAP GUI be merged into this article as a subheading relating to SAP ERP, as it's kind of not terribly useful as an article by itself. [ roux ] [x] 08:58, 29 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Agreed that SAP GUI was not terribly useful. Redirected SAP GUI to SAPgui, and removed merge request. Jethero^Talk 02:11, 27 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

Both article seem to share the same subject matter and may benefit from being merged.

Ghaag (talk) 01:42, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The products have significant differences, so I advise keeping the two entries separate. Crysb (talk) 17:41, 15 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I haven't studied the previous version that was proposed for deletion, but the current version definitely contains some advertisment-like language and suspicious material, and looks strange to me as a whole. Some examples:

• "SAP ERP systems effectively implemented can have huge cost benefits." has no encyclopedic value
• some sections appear to be duplicate (e.g. "Benefits of SAP ERP" and "Advantages and disadvantages of SAP ERP")
• half of the references are to the same book
• "Deployment and maintenance costs" says nothing about the costs of deploying SAP ERP —Preceding unsigned comment added by TinyFirstman (talk • contribs) 15:41, 11 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Looked at this article and rewrote/removed much of the content in question. Should read much better now, but still requires the addition of multiple references. Crysb (talk) 17:40, 15 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The section marked for tone sounds like an advertisement, not encyclopedic. And it needs citations of companies touting the benefits. Crasshopper (talk) 03:20, 22 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I made some changes to the paragraph where SAP ERP had been described in advertising style —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.240.244.161 (talk) 16:29, 16 July 2010 (UTC) 83.240.244.161 (talk) 16:32, 16 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ummmm... can *anyone* do anything about this? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.89.174.132 (talk) 14:43, 22 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This really is a poorly written article which could have been written as promotional material. Surely something can be done with it? Roseofwinter (talk) 16:41, 11 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Definition of the scope of SAP ERP needs more work: the current definition is incomplete. Rather than make up the scope from memory this should be taken from original SAP literature. 109.145.136.140 (talk) 20:29, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I recently tried to improve the SAP ERP page (especially the Development and Implementation sections). I also added the following sources to support the content.

 http://www.saponlinetutorials.com/about-sap-modules-sap-modules-list-overview/
 https://www.udemy.com/sap-project/
 http://searchsap.techtarget.com/tip/Prevent-SAP-ERP-implementation-failure
 https://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/Deloitte/mx/Documents/human-capital/01_ERP_Top10_Challenges.pdf

I see the article was flagged in 2011 as having multiple issues. Is there a way to trigger a review to see if the article has improved enough to remove the issues listed at the top of the page?

Olivia0452 (talk) 08:21, 2 March 2017 (UTC)Olivia0452[reply]

The infobox contains an unsupported statement that the initial release of SAP was in 1972. The "official" company history says they started the company in 1972 and had software in 1975. (talk) 11:45, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]