This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the SAP ERP article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | It is requested that a video clip or video clips be included in this article to improve its quality. |
![]() | It is requested that an image or photograph of SAP ERP be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
Since I have been redirected from mySAP to this page I would have expected at least to find the word in the article. Unfortunately, this is not the case ... --82.135.125.90 08:25, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
I propose that SAP GUI be merged into this article as a subheading relating to SAP ERP, as it's kind of not terribly useful as an article by itself. [ roux ] [x] 08:58, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
Hi,
Both article seem to share the same subject matter and may benefit from being merged.
Ghaag (talk) 01:42, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
I haven't studied the previous version that was proposed for deletion, but the current version definitely contains some advertisment-like language and suspicious material, and looks strange to me as a whole. Some examples:
The section marked for tone sounds like an advertisement, not encyclopedic. And it needs citations of companies touting the benefits. Crasshopper (talk) 03:20, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
I made some changes to the paragraph where SAP ERP had been described in advertising style —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.240.244.161 (talk) 16:29, 16 July 2010 (UTC) 83.240.244.161 (talk) 16:32, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
Ummmm... can *anyone* do anything about this? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.89.174.132 (talk) 14:43, 22 May 2012 (UTC)
This really is a poorly written article which could have been written as promotional material. Surely something can be done with it? Roseofwinter (talk) 16:41, 11 December 2013 (UTC)
Definition of the scope of SAP ERP needs more work: the current definition is incomplete. Rather than make up the scope from memory this should be taken from original SAP literature. 109.145.136.140 (talk) 20:29, 29 July 2013 (UTC)
Hi there, I recently tried to improve the SAP ERP page (especially the Development and Implementation sections). I also added the following sources to support the content.
http://www.saponlinetutorials.com/about-sap-modules-sap-modules-list-overview/ https://www.udemy.com/sap-project/ http://searchsap.techtarget.com/tip/Prevent-SAP-ERP-implementation-failure https://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/Deloitte/mx/Documents/human-capital/01_ERP_Top10_Challenges.pdf
I see the article was flagged in 2011 as having multiple issues. Is there a way to trigger a review to see if the article has improved enough to remove the issues listed at the top of the page?
Olivia0452 (talk) 08:21, 2 March 2017 (UTC)Olivia0452
The infobox contains an unsupported statement that the initial release of SAP was in 1972. The "official" company history says they started the company in 1972 and had software in 1975. (talk) 11:45, 15 October 2022 (UTC)