This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Royal Rumble (2006) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
The Undertaker vs Kurt Angle main event of No Way Out has been advertised nationally in Canada on Bell ExpressVu (perhaps others) since Jan. 23 (maybe longer). Doesn't this make it 'official'?
Unless Helms held the WWE Cruiserweight Title when he was still The Hurricane, the entry on the page right now is factually incorrect. Helms did hold a cruiserweight title in WWE when he first arrived, but that was the WCW belt, as part of the invasion. I'm not aware of the lineage of the two titles ever being merged, which as a result makes them seperate. He's a one-time WWE champion and a former WCW champion. BronzeWarrior 08:14, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
Why does the fact that "Big Show and Kane were eliminated simultaneously by Triple H." deserve a footnote or *? Yes, it was really cool ..they were in the midst of trying to elminate each other when Triple H took advantage of the situation and shoved them both over the top rope ...but ...I still don't think it warrants its own note. Please comment, or I will remove it. --Naha|(talk) 20:37, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
Comment - Ok I see this has also been done in other Royal Rumble articles, but I still contend its not worthy of a footnote, and would like to see it removed from other articles as well. --Naha|(talk) 20:49, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
Nevermind, I see. --Naha|(talk) 15:02, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
"This year's Royal Rumble Match featured only 14 RAW Superstars and 14 SmackDown Superstars, since both Tatanka and Goldust were surprise entrants and came in representing neither brand."
I was wondering about the comment I quoted above. Goldust appeared on RAW this past Monday night, so I do think he represented RAW in the Rumble, just as a suprise. I don't know if Tatanka was on Smackdown! or not, but if he was (is?), does this statement still stand? Eric42 03:29, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
Goldust was also on RAW a few months back in a one-off appearance, but he was on it. Still, I don't think he really counted as a RAW member until they put him on the RAW roster page - when he was on RAW after the Rumble he wasn't even under contract yet. He is now, so perhaps we should just add a note to it stating he has since signed with RAW. Tigermave 03:41, 2 February 2006 (UTC)Tigermave
Shouldn't undertakers return be added somewhere. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Masterman4 (talk • contribs) 17:34, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
The picture of Mark Henry is covering some of the table and you can't see the time of the cruiserweight match! I don't know how to fix it so if any anyone knows how to do it can they move it up or something? ThanksAdster95 (talk) 13:02, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
Why are the colours for Raw and SmackDown so light? Mobile mundo (talk) 19:59, 25 January 2017 (UTC)