Good articleRegine at the Theater has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Good topic starRegine at the Theater is part of the Regine Velasquez residencies series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
August 26, 2023Good article nomineeListed
June 23, 2024Good topic candidatePromoted
Current status: Good article

Did you know nomination

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by BorgQueen (talk) 15:55, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

(
)

References

  1. ^ Buan-Deveza, Reyma (October 27, 2015). "Regine's concert to feature songs from musical theater" (in Tagalog). ABS-CBNnews.com. Retrieved January 29, 2023.
  2. ^ a b Siazon, Rachelle (October 7, 2015). "Regine Velasquez excited to perform hit songs from Rak of Aegis, Katy! The Musical during her concert series". Philippine Entertainment Portal (in Tagalog). Retrieved January 29, 2023.

Created by Pseud 14 (talk). Self-nominated at 22:14, 3 February 2023 (UTC). Note: As of October 2022, all changes made to promoted hooks will be logged by a bot. The log for this nomination can be found at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Regine at the Theater, so please watch a successfully closed nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems

Hook eligibility:

QPQ: Done.

Overall: @Pseud 14: Good article, but the hook is not interesting to me. If you could suggest a new hook then that would be great. Onegreatjoke (talk) 19:08, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Onegreatjoke: added alternative hook. Let me know what you think and feel free to edit/improve. Pseud 14 (talk) 00:36, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Onegreatjoke: status report? theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/her) 09:19, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Pseud 14: I'm not really a big fan of the new hook. It doesn't seem all that interesting to me. Onegreatjoke (talk) 18:52, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Onegreatjoke: I would argue that since Velasquez only did one theater stint and is a pop artist, it would make sense and would warrant interest to mention where she starred in and the role she played with respect to the concert series theme. However, if you find that there are other interesting facts that stand out better in the article than the hook(s) presented, feel free to suggest. @Theleekycauldron: I gather we can have a fresh set of eyes from other reviewers offer other perspective too, similar to other DYK reviews? Lmk if you have some suggestions as well. Pseud 14 (talk) 19:03, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not sure if if ALT3 counts as a BLP violation, but if it doesn't then I think it's actually the best option here. ALT2 is kinda meh-ish. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 00:04, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Onegreatjoke: Thoughts on the new hooks? Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 09:31, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The only hook I find interesting is alt3 but if that's considered too negative then i don't know. I'll approve it though. Onegreatjoke (talk) 20:19, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Regine at the Theater/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Grk1011 (talk · contribs) 15:47, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I will be reviewing this for you! Grk1011 (talk) 15:47, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
Comments as outlined below. Table updated as issues are addressed.
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section): b (inline citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

Infobox and lead

[edit]
That's my bad, it is Nov 21. Fixed
Added
Revised.

Background and development

[edit]
Done
Revised
Not sure what you meant to fix on this, but if it's adding Philippines after Paranaque, I've done so too.
Added
I don't think it'll add value to include giving away free or complimentary tickets or etc, from sponsors. Concert/Tours generally do not incorporate such.
Done
Done
Unfortunately, sourcing or citations within the Philippines are a bit of a challenge, even for recent ones. I've made this approach to another GA of her concert (Twenty (concert) as well.
It's mentioned in ref 5: This concert series (which was conceptualized two years ago)

Synopsis and reception

[edit]
Done
I've linked to Mashup (music) to provide context
Done
Gemora appeared in all shows, Santos and Viray alternated in both weekends. Added note in the "Shows" section

Set list

[edit]
Added

Shows

[edit]

Other GA criteria

[edit]

Discussion

[edit]

Hi @Pseud 14: this looks good. Only minor issues to take a look at. Grk1011 (talk) 14:54, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for taking up this review Grk1011. I have addressed your comments and provided my response. LEt me know if there's anything I may have missed. Pseud 14 (talk) 16:23, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Looks great. Happy to pass this now. Grk1011 (talk) 16:53, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Categories