The article suffers from grammar and prose issues. Just to name a few:
Lede
produced by Mansoor Ahmed Siddiqui under the ANAS Films banner and directed by Talat Jani. Only notable names (i.e. those with Wikipedia articles) are identified in the lede (MOS:FILMLEDE)
Why are there words or names italicized words when they shouldn't be?
The film revolves around two girls—Pooja (Jhulka) and Kajal (Bharti), who, unaware of their real identities, fall in love with the same boy Yogi (Sadanah). Don't you mean "unaware of each other's identities"?
But, upon learning about their connection, one of them decides to sacrifice for the other, while also trying to reunite their family. Sentence is confusing. For one, whose connection, the women's?
Plot
As per MOS:FILMPLOT, plot summaries should be between 400 and 700 words; this current plot has 1295 words. Pointing out the grammar issues thereto would be utterly useless. Please leave out unnecessary details that don't serve the reader's understanding of the movie.
Production
Again, why are there several names italicized when they shouldn't be?
died midway while shooting for it "died halfway through the shoot"
the film was released three months after her death, posthumously. tautological; to release something posthumously is to release it after one's death
Initially, Talat Jani had tried to rope in his sister-in-law Rubaina for the female lead unencyclopedic word choice
Later, after Bharti's death, she appeared in some scenes as the body double. "A body double stood in for Bharti in scenes that she left unfilmed."
Finally, Bharti was signed in place of Kapoor and since the latter was not anymore a part of the film, Jhulka agreed to retain her role. "Finally" is editorial word choice
Release and reception
Besides India, the film took a bumper opening in the United States and Canada, mainly because it was promoted as being Divya Bharti's last film; people gathered into the theaters to get a last glimpse of her. unencyclopedic phrase
Major pieces of information are missing from the article. Firstly, production section mostly talks about casting, there is no information beyond that. Casting is only one step in the stages of filmmaking. There is no information on how the film came to be through concept, writing, editing, music composition, etc. Secondly, Critical reviews for the film were mixed to positive is unreferenced and substantiated by a single review that only cites the positive reaction. Bottomline, expansion is needed for the Release and reception to give appropriate weight to both positive and negative reactions.