This page was proposed for deletion by Plenty afoot (talk · contribs) on 9 June 2009. It was contested by 70.75.47.157 (talk · contribs) on 2009-06-15 |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
[deleted comment] LessHeard vanU (talk) 14:01, 2 March 2011 (UTC) (Oversight volunteer)
Done Actually, both of you are wrong. It's not "vandalism", because Wikipedia defines vandalism as something done intentionally to make the encyclopedia worse (like adding curse words to the middle of articles, or deleting large chunks of text for "fun"). However, Jonathanwallace is about the underlying idea of keeping this in the article. The Calgary Herald article does properly source the information in this article; however, that information has no business in this article. Nothing in the Herald indicates this was Scurfield's fault; rather, it connects it with policy at the ski resort along with some sort of "protest" about the treatment of another worker. All of this is probably relevant to the Sunshine Village article (although there would have to be some discretion to make sure that this one event was notable enough to include in the company's article), but it's not notable enough to Scurfield's story. The only way we could include this information would be if we had a reliable source that clearly laid blame/responsibility on Scurfield, and even then the inclusion would be questionable. As such, I am removing the information from the article, per WP:BLP and WP:NPOV. I am also going to go check the Village article to see how the issue is being treated there). Qwyrxian (talk) 02:20, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
Semi-protection should not be used as a pre-emptive measure against vandalism that has not yet occurred, nor should it be used solely to prevent editing by anonymous and newly registered users. The information stated above is true and should remain on the site. (RevyMan (talk) 16:31, 31 January 2011 (UTC))
Scurfield was directly involved in the firings. Spin it how you like. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 205.206.133.12 (talk) 04:41, 17 March 2012 (UTC)