This article was nominated for deletion on 29 August 2016. The result of the discussion was keep.

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

England Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Football: England / English non-league Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FootballWikipedia:WikiProject FootballTemplate:WikiProject Footballfootball articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the English football task force (assessed as Low-importance). This article is supported by the English non-league task force (assessed as Low-importance). Devon Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Devon, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Devon on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DevonWikipedia:WikiProject DevonTemplate:WikiProject DevonDevon articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is currently dominated by information about a Sunday League team that apparently has no relationship with the original Plymouth United team, or with the second team formed in the 1940s, other than sharing the name. Personally I think everything to do with the Sunday League team needs to come out of this article, but my attempts to do this were reverted without explanation by an IP editor. I'm inclined to repeat my previous edit, but have no interest in getting involved in an edit war, so before I do that has anyone else got any opinions on the current state of this page? — GasHeadSteve _[TALK] 21:29, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• I believe it is perfectly legitimate to include the Sunday league stuff. You can make it clear in the article that several teams used the name. No one team has ownership of name and it would be ridiculous to separate the article considering it is so small. DjlnDjln (talk) 07:29, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

That was Plymouth Argyle. So I am removing that information. I am reverting back to the PROD. Unless an article can be created about the team from 1944 then this should be deleted. Please see the talk on the football project. Govvy (talk) 07:16, 29 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Plymouth United F.C.. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20161202045559/http://greensonscreen.co.uk/argylehistory.asp?era=1886-1890 to http://www.greensonscreen.co.uk/argylehistory.asp?era=1886-1890

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:22, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]