This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The only major piece of forensic evidence in the case is the negative of a Polaroid
Is this what actually happens in the film? Because, Polaroid pictures don't have negatives. 207.31.229.4 13:56, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
I fail to see how any of the 'goofs' are actually goofs. Heck, CNN makes typos to millions of people live all the time. I have no doubt the Pentagon could misspell a word. Lots42 23:36, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 15:59, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
Image:NoWayOut3.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 15:40, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
Image:No Way out.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 16:24, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
,it has allowed me to understand the plot twist in the end : it is not clear at all in the french version. As for the first 15 minutes of the film, the meeting and "coup de foudre" ("lightning stroke") between Susan & Tom, they are beautifully filmed & most impressive...T.y. Arapaima (talk) 07:00, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
I have shortened it a little. I think it's still too long, but that was the best I could do gramorak 12:13, 6 August 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gramorak (talk • contribs)
If it's uncredited and unconfirmed, it shouldn't be here, so I'm taking him out. Mingmingla (talk) 23:32, 19 November 2011 (UTC)
That's totally him in it, isn't it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.18.34.59 (talk) 18:53, 12 July 2016 (UTC)