GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: The4lines (talk · contribs) 02:58, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


@SpinningSpark: I will start this review now. It is my first review so please if I miss something or forget something please tell me. Best, Signed,The4lines |||| (You Asked?) (What I have Done.) 02:58, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

Early ideas

[edit]

Gauss and Weber telegraph

[edit]

Steinheil first installed his telegraph along five miles of track covering four stations around Munich When did he do it?

Overall

[edit]

Does not seem to me to have many porblems! Great refs and facts. Almost sure it is good to go after you fix the stuff I put. Best, Signed,The4lines |||| (You Asked?) (What I have Done.) 03:25, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Spinningspark: Passing, again sorry for the mistakes, it was my first rewiew. Signed,The4lines |||| (You Asked?) (What I have Done.) 14:26, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
That's no problem, better to have the issues looked at than not. SpinningSpark 15:23, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]