![]() | This ![]() It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Um... the summaries start with chapter 5. where's 1-4? Vote4jr (talk) 03:06, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
Should the Preface, Letter, and Appendix be included? dude1818 (talk) 21:04, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
Regarding this sentence at the end of the first paragraph, wasn't the abolitionist movement before and during the Civil War? (So 19th century?)
"In factual detail, the text describes the events of his life and is considered to be one of the most influential pieces of literature to fuel the abolitionist movement of the early 20th century in the United States." — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:646:8B82:45A0:515A:34CB:6CC2:708A (talk) 00:14, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.
This is an important book, as stated in the very short article. I probably will not have the time, but I hope someone could work on improving it. Check with other biographies to see what you need to put. Right now I suggest just trying to make this article longer, so people can learn more about this important book. Thank You. --Robin63 16:02, 2 April 2007 (UTC) |
Last edited at 16:02, 2 April 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 00:51, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
This article is listed as level-5 vital article, and imho rightly so. Still, there is little activity, and it is still rated start-class, imho rightly so. There is another problem: Since Douglass wrote three autobiographies, having a very similar content for the first decades of his life, the articles on those autobiographies tend to be redundant. To solve both the problems of inactivity / manpower and of redundancy, I'd suggest to create an article "Autobiographies of Frederick Douglass", and merge the content of three articles.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Rsk6400 (talk • contribs) 19:56, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
I have read the reactions to the text part several times, the text appears on several other websites discussing the book and referencing the Norton critical edition. However, I've looked for this letter, bought the actual Norton book and cannot find any mention of the letter in question. The book simply says he published a response, but the letter itself is not present. Should we either remove this reference to the letter being in the book, or may someone else point out to me where exactly this letter in in the book? Edward Liu 323 (talk) 06:22, 7 November 2021 (UTC)
2600:1700:8490:8460:1849:5ABD:37D2:B758 (talk) 14:13, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
This section of the article is dense with field-specific jargon, and is inaccessible to most readers. I’m far from qualified to revise the section, but I wanted to flag it so that someone with expertise in the field can revise how the article presents this important aspect of Douglass’s work. 2600:8800:9C04:B00:A048:67E3:7169:F7EA (talk) 00:04, 8 February 2023 (UTC)