FFA's won[edit]

Can someone confirm how many FFA's he has won in his entire career? --Kdramatics (talk) 23:06, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Cleanup[edit]

Without mentioning questions of factual accuracy, there are some serious gramatical errors. I don't really know much about the leagues and tournaments involved in this article, but I do think the grammar needs a little help.

This particular sentence needs to be fixed (i suggest getting rid of it altogether). It's an interesting article though. I don't think it needs to be deleted, and it is certainly not beyond repair. InternetandSpace 21:39, 12 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]


the recent revisions look good. InternetandSpace 20:17, 13 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Can we please lock the tables that show who his team was for certain seasons or even remove them. It is FILLED with inaccuracies, placed there by children who want to pretend they competed with Matt in the earlier MLG seasons. I dont feel like correcting all of it just to come back and see that someone decided to pretend they were pro 5 years and and edit the facts. -chaosTheory {Major League Gaming Staff) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.94.21.149 (talk) 00:41, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Article should be renamed to Matt Leto[edit]

The article should be renamed to Matt Leto and the page Zyos should serve as a redirect, just as the articles on Johnathan Wendel (Fatal1ty) and Emil Christensen (HeatoN) are. --Credema 08:09, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If there is no objection within a few days, I will do the rename myself. J0lt C0la 15:22, 16 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Done. J0lt C0la 22:28, 20 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Date of birth[edit]

What's the correct date of birth? Lead sentence has December 2, but elsewhere in article has December 1.--A bit iffy (talk) 11:20, 26 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Matt Leto/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Red Phoenix (talk · contribs) 20:49, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Short and sweet, I like it. I'm starting a review now. Red Phoenix build the future...remember the past... 20:49, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
    I see some prose issues, namely with consistency. I'll list them below this review template.
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
    Amazing sourcing job here for a short article. Looking over the list as someone who's quite familiar with WP:VG/S, I can't see anything that would indicate a lack of reliability on any of these. All of the sources look good, and they're used quite well to source pretty much everything in the article.
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
    As I looked over the sources, reference 2 has quite a bit more detail on the events that led up to Zyos' retirement, including his loss as part of team "XiT Woundz" in 2006 and his walkout from his team and from the professional circuit. How come the article simply says that he retired in 2006 when this information is already available in a reference? Right now this article is missing that information, and I believe needs it in order to meet 3b. There's no NPOV violation to talk about that.
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
    I don't see any point of view issues.
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
    Looks to be quite stable. Survived a deletion attempt and then nominated for GA status by the same editor a month later? That's pretty amazing, but hey, it just shows devotion to our work here.
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
    No images at all? I suppose getting a free image of Matt Leto would be quite tough, especially since he's not a professional player anymore. I wouldn't call not having an image a dealbreaker, but I will say I'm not sure this would ever make FA criteria without at least one. That being said, for a GA review I wouldn't call it a necessity.
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
    Almost there. Just needs a bit of prose touchup and additional info.

Prose issues


Red Phoenix build the future...remember the past... 21:25, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, all issues should be addressed now. Thanks for catching that info on his retirement, I looked far and wide and it was right in front of me! I'd love a picture too, but i cant find any free use ones, perhaps with time. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 23:50, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Nicely done! I don't think you needed to duplicate the reference so many times; it's perfectly acceptable to leave a couple of sentences without a reference if it's the same reference for all of those sentences together and that in-line citation is used at the end of that group of sentences. Nonetheless, I'd say we meet the GA criteria at this time. Good job. Red Phoenix build the future...remember the past... 00:15, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 8 external links on Matt Leto. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template ((source check)) (last update: 5 June 2024).

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:55, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 31 May 2022[edit]

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

No consensus to move. After much-extended time for discussion, there is no consensus for a move at this time. BD2412 T 19:11, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Matt LetoZyos – Per WP:COMMONNAME; follows suit with nearly all esports player article titles. – Pbrks (t • c) 18:59, 30 May 2022 (UTC) — Relisting. ModernDayTrilobite (talkcontribs) 20:47, 9 June 2022 (UTC) — Relisting. — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 03:25, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is a contested technical request (permalink). GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 14:08, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.