This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
User:NatashaValentina1 is apparently the daughter of Maria Sachs. She states this on her talk page. Jason Quinn (talk) 20:43, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
((citation style))
. Captain n00dle\Talk 20:08, 15 January 2012 (UTC)/* COI Discussion */ Hello- I need some help on this article. It's been now since September 2011, I belive, that we've had a giant banner across the article stating the neutrality is called into question. Could you please advise how this article can be re-reviewed, perhaps information should be withdrawn if its not verifiable- so that the banner issue is addressed and the article can return to normal again? Thank you for your guidance on this! . — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2620:0:1040:404:CABC:C8FF:FEDC:1122 (talk) 12:06, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can , contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse. |
am trying to figure out how to address any issues with the page so the banner at the top- which has been on there almost a year- can be resolved. thank you for your help — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bambola1242 (talk • contribs) 13:59, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
This request for help from administrators has been answered. If you need more help or have additional questions, please reapply the ((admin help)) template, or contact the responding user(s) directly on their own user talk page. |
The wiki page here has a COI banner on the top for almost a year and I'm not sure how to best resolve any COI dispute so we can remove the banner. I have been trying to research how best to rectify any outstanding issues with the profile but would also call upon any senior editor to review the page and remove anything that could be construed as COI so that the page can be posted with a normal status again. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bambola1242 (talk • contribs) 20:10, 29 July 2012
Removing partisan, non essential content added by user User:Sunshine Disinfects during the 2012 political campaign for WP:AVOID| for the use of "claims" as well as [[:WP:WELLKNOWN| for not referencing additional sources. Bambola1242 (talk) 12:37, 4 January 2013 (UTC) Bambola1242 (talk) 12:37, 4 January 2013 (UTC)
I've removed some attack content which was written in a shamelessly partisan way, and sourced to such non-reliable sources as a business Political action committee's website. If there are substantive accusations out there, then they should be dispassionately reported upon, using independent, non-partisan reliable sources. --Orange Mike | Talk 20:07, 18 October 2012 (UTC)
The information was also reported in the Palm Beach Post on October 18, 2012[1] . I am reposting with the correct independent, non-partisan citations.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Sunshine Disinfects (talk • contribs) — Sunshine Disinfects (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
Fair enough. Then you shouldn't mind the direct quote from the paper I am about to post. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sunshine Disinfects (talk • contribs) 22:46, 18 October 2012 (UTC)
Comment: Just want to state agreement with Orangemike that the original additions by Sunshine Disinfects were far outside our guidelines for biographies. Sunshine Disinfects, the editors of Wikipedia are trying to build a high-quality, professional-caliber encyclopedia. The welcome message posted on your talk page gives some valuable links discussing what this means. In particular, you should read Wikipedia:Neutral point of view carefully. Being a successful editor requires knowing about (and avoiding) concepts like undue weight. We also have standards for what constitute reliable sources. Primary sources must be used with great care. Due to undue weight and primary source concerns, I also concur with Malerooster on his removal of your newer additions. Lastly, because of neutrality, we have a very strict policy on conflict of interest. If this topic is, in any way, a conflict of interest for you, you should be very careful when editing, if not abstaining totally from editing this article. That you have only editing related to this and with such prejudice raises my eyebrow. Do you have a COI here? Jason Quinn (talk) 05:09, 19 October 2012 (UTC)
The candidate has been in office for six years, and only this week, as the Republican party has posted an ethics violations as the newspaper article cited states. This is an allegation done by the opposing party (the GOP) to obfuscate their record of their own candidate who also has had ethic violations charged against her in previous years (but does not have this posted on her wikipedia page). A public records request to the State has failed to produce any documentation that would substantiate the politically-motivated claim. This type of 'ethics allegations' cropping up these past two weeks has also occurred in multiple other state senate races throughout the state of Florida- all directed toward one party. For this reason, even the publishing of this "ethics violation charge" is politically motivated and should be removed. Bambola1242 (talk) 12:08, 19 October 2012 (UTC)User:Bambola1242
I would agree if the documents were false. What is the problem with providing links to the actual official documents included in the allegation [2] (which proves the violation) and letting the readers decide? I understand you want to scrub facts that make your candidate look bad, but just because you don't like bad things about your candidate, doesn't mean it's not true. More information of criminal activity is coming out daily. After the election, it will all back back. Stay tuned...— Preceding unsigned comment added by Sunshine Disinfects (talk • contribs) — Sunshine Disinfects (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
Why was her religion removed?— Preceding unsigned comment added by Sunshine Disinfects (talk • contribs) — Sunshine Disinfects (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
References