GA Review

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: Kusma (talk · contribs) 12:44, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Chiswick Chap (talk · contribs) 15:35, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

[edit]
"May I say that it is not a 'study', except in domestic slang: in happier days I had one. It was a hastily contrived necessity, when I was obliged to relinquish my room in college and provide a store for what I could preserve of my library. ... my part-time secretary ... is the only regular user of the room. I have never written any literary matter in it. ... I am caught here in acute discomfort ...
If you wonder why I received you ... in such a hole, may I say that my house has no reception room but my wife's sitting-room, filled with her personal belongings. This was contemptuously described in the New Yorker (by a visitor), and we both suffered ridicule (and worse: commiseration) when this was quoted in the London papers. Since then she has refused to admit anybody but personal friends to the room."
You might want to use a bit of this as it explains why visitors like Carroux were received in the absurdly cold and unwelcoming garage room. It could be a footnote; at least a link to the source (you can use ((ME-ref|Letters)) ... 294 .as above) would be helpful.
Thank you, that's great! Will add this soon. Added a footnote.

BTW I added dates of birth and death from the original source, a death notice (not a full obituary) announcing her funeral for the same day. —Kusma (talk) 22:36, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Images

[edit]

Sources

[edit]

Summary

[edit]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.