This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the List of Linux distributions article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed Article policies Neutral point of view No original research Verifiability

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1, 2, 3Auto-archiving period: 120 days

This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Lists This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. Computing: Software / Free and open-source software Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Software. This article is supported by Free and open-source software (assessed as Mid-importance). Linux High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Linux, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Linux on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LinuxWikipedia:WikiProject LinuxTemplate:WikiProject LinuxLinux articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article has been mentioned by a media organization: Katy Waldman (11 October 2013). "Wikipedia Editing Party at Brown University! Woohoo!". Slate (magazine). Archived from the original on 13 October 2013. Retrieved 13 October 2013. Topic bias means that issues of concern to geek dudes (such as Linux distributions) are rated as important, while issues women might find compelling (the design of Kate Middleton's wedding dress, say) are deemed trivial and flagged for deletion.

Where is the Chinese backed distribution? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ceros (talk • contribs) 29 okt 2006 04:48‎ (UTC)

I tried adding openKylin twice but it keeps getting reverted. First by TechnoSquirrel69 because it wasn't sourced even though it links to Kylin which has a line on openKylin. I added links to an article and the official website for my second attempt but it was reverted by Manticore because it was "not notable". Do I have to build out an entire page dedicated to openKylin before I can add it to this list? It has 1 M users I would call that notable. Ironsmith-K (talk) 02:01, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, entries listed here should be notable and have a standalone article, meaning an article that is directly about the distribution being added, rather than a redirect to an article that mentions it briefly. WP:AFC is a good place to get started with such an article. - Aoidh (talk) 02:14, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

How come Red Hat is not here but Fedora is here? I would add some of th info, but I can't enter the tech info so I'm not spoiling other people's good work...

• It's just a list - most of the "tech info" here is propagandist (--------) that should be replaced by hard facts with Comparison of Linux distributions anyways. Therefore, just add it yourself. ¦ Reisio 09:44, 2005 August 18 (UTC)

• It's mentioned there. Look above commercial distributions. Jaalto 2005-11-24

(REDHAT is pay only, non-GNU, I would dare to say they are no longer a Linux Distro as a (wiki) dictionary defines it.)

monomaxos.com was formerly a porn site, now for sale. This Ubuntu flavour is discontinued. Please remove link. --— Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.61.62.243 (talk • contribs) 22 feb 2020 02:00 (UTC)

linux is not monolithic it's modular it was one of the first popular modular kernels; which can be micro if the user desires. mach uses different file structs to talk to its parts and is written by different people - is it definitely different but not by much if talking about modularity alone. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.219.207.23 (talk • contribs) 4 apr 2016 14:43 (UTC)