The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article is related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing this article:
You must be logged-in and extended-confirmed to edit or discuss this topic on any page (except for making edit requests, provided they are not disruptive)
You may not make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on any edits related to this topic
The exceptions to the extended confirmed restriction are:
Non-extended-confirmed editors may use the "Talk:" namespace only to make edit requests related to articles within the topic area, provided they are not disruptive.
Non-extended-confirmed editors may not create new articles, but administrators may exercise discretion when deciding how to enforce this remedy on article creations. Deletion of new articles created by non-extended-confirmed editors is permitted but not required.
With respect to the WP:1RR restriction:
Clear vandalism of whatever origin may be reverted without restriction. Also, reverts made solely to enforce the extended confirmed restriction are not considered edit warring.
Editors who violate this restriction may be blocked by any uninvolved administrator, even on a first offence.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Israel, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Israel on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IsraelWikipedia:WikiProject IsraelTemplate:WikiProject IsraelIsrael-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Death, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Death on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DeathWikipedia:WikiProject DeathTemplate:WikiProject DeathDeath articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palestine, a team effort dedicated to building and maintaining comprehensive, informative and balanced articles related to the geographic Palestine region, the Palestinian people and the State of Palestine on Wikipedia. Join us by visiting the project page, where you can add your name to the list of members where you can contribute to the discussions.PalestineWikipedia:WikiProject PalestineTemplate:WikiProject PalestinePalestine-related articles
The assassination of shereen abu aqleh should be added to the list of Israeli assassinations and the fact that she was assassinated due to her work exposing the Israeli violation of human rights
And the prof of that is how Israel was caught lying and blaming the Palestinian armed forces when it was proven that they were nowhere near the group of journalists 2A02:CB80:408B:8986:C4FF:8C0F:18ED:88D2 (talk) 15:29, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
There is no evidence to suggest that the Israelis intentionally killed Shireen Abu Akleh, if it was intentional why would Israel shoot her in a firefight, wouldn't it make more sense to poison her or make it look like Israel wasn't involved (like they did in many assassinations in the past). You need to remember Shireen actually lived in Jerusalem which is completely under Israeli rule they could have got to her pretty quickly don't you think?. you are right to claim that Israel was wrong to immediately blame the Palestinians but the Palestinians are just as wrong for immediately blaming the Israelis with out some sort of evidence to back their claim. Yakir-morris (talk) 23:42, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
It's very obvious it was intentional, you can even read the Shireen Abu Akleh wiki top section itself:
Israel denied responsibility for her death and blamed Palestinian militants, despite initial reports by her colleagues accusing Israeli soldiers. Israel later claimed it was possible she had been killed by either side, and on 5 September, admitted it was likely she was "accidentally" hit by its forces, but refused to undertake a criminal investigation.[1][2] The admission came after investigations conducted by international news outlets, including The New York Times and The Washington Post concluded that she was killed by Israeli forces, with CNN finding that her death was the result of a targeted Israeli killing. Investigations by the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights and US State Department also found Israel responsible.[2]Forensic Architecture refuted Israel's findings on 20 September, and said Abu Akleh was deliberately targeted and denied medical aid.[3] In November 2022, the US Department of Justice opened an investigation into the killing, a move that Israel condemned and refused to cooperate with.
The screaming-in-your-face conclusion is that, yes, she was intentionally killed. No need to speculate about "wouldn't it make more sense for them to" because we already know, based on their own admission and and media/government/UN probes/investigations. This isn't their first assault on the press... 2605:A601:A629:3300:9486:A4DD:5342:95CA (talk) 07:53, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.
A simple grammatical correction regarding plural versus singular, here... "Assassination were permitted..." Should be "Assassinations were permitted... (or) "Assassination was permitted..."
Thank you for your consideration of this simple emendation. -Reedmaven Reedmaven (talk) 13:35, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]