This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Leslye Headland article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Leslye Headland. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template ((source check))
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:59, 21 December 2017 (UTC)
With her being announced as showrunner of the upcoming female-centric Star Wars series, Leslye Headland is becoming a target for anti-feminist internet trolls. That means an increased risk of this article getting vandalized. I believe it might be wise to pro-actively issue some level of protection. 46.97.170.78 (talk) 12:49, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 04:37, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
Her bio states that the TV show "the acolyte" received mixed reviews from critics and low reviews from the general audience, citing the website "rotten tomatoes" as a source. However, in the website the critics' score is 85% (hardly "mixed"), and has been getting review bomber by trolls since the start (source) I think it's incorrect to maintain in her biography that her first Disney+ show has been getting mixed to bad reviews and should be edited. Laslus07 (talk) 03:46, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
On Rotten Tomatoes, the series has an average approval rating of 84% based 102 critics' reviews, while receiving a generally unfavorable rating from the general audience on Metacritic
In the Career section it is written that "Headland spent six years working as an assistant at Miramax, four years of which was spent as Harvey Weinstein's personal assistant" as reported in her RottenTomatoes profile (source 7).
However both in the Vulture and Entertainment Weekly interviews (sources 8 and 10) it is claimed by the author of the article and Headland herself respectively that she filled that position for a year: "Headland also talked about her 2008 play Assistance, which she wrote after spending a year as Harvey Weinstein’s assistant" (Vulture) and " I worked for the copresident of production at Miramax. I work for Harvey for about a year, and then I worked for Arianna Huffington for about a month." (EW)
Is there a reason why in the Wikipedia article it was decided to go with four years over one? (e.g. RottenTomatoes considered as accurate/trustworthy over personal recollections?) AlbertoSeptim (talk) 07:12, 5 July 2024 (UTC)