This article was nominated for deletion on 24 September 2011 (UTC). The result of the discussion was redirect to Dowry law in India. |
This article was nominated for deletion on 14 May 2007 (UTC). The result of the discussion was no consensus. |
This disambiguation page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||
|
This page was nominated at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion on 28 March 2012. The result of the discussion was disambiguate. |
Is it just me, or does linking a vague political term to a specific area seem a tad bit misleading? Calling the dowry law of India "legal terrorism" seems quite offensive, akin redirecting Bullshit to Law of the United States. PotentialDanger (talk) 00:52, 17 November 2011 (UTC)
I arrived at this redirect from an entirely unrelated page. The impression was political vandalism, hence my deletion. I see now that a redirect consensus was reached from an earlier version of the page. I don't have an account anymore (no patience with the hostility and politics), so I haven't attempted to call a vote on this content deletion.
Revert if you wish, but consider that:
Redirecting is plain misleading at best, especially given the source articles. The use of the term in India, referenced in the vote, whether real or not, is a subject for a national language WP version. Absent an article on Legal terrorism, where a "See also" or other mention may be appropriate, it is impossible for me (as a reader, not editor) to experience the redirect as other than POV. This redirect was an epic QA fail... 85.200.17.164 (talk) 15:28, 22 November 2011 (UTC)
I came here from a general legal wikipage on Chilling_Effects. I was expecting to read about harassment by state or private actors through legal means. Indian dowry laws seem way to specific for such a broad term. 109.33.67.73 (talk) 10:19, 13 January 2012 (UTC)