Did you know nomination[edit]

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Theleekycauldron (talk21:37, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Created by Ezlev (talk). Self-nominated at 05:18, 30 September 2021 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough

Policy compliance:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
  • Cited: Yes - Offline/paywalled citation accepted in good faith
  • Interesting: Yes
QPQ: Done.

Overall: "He stated in 2019 that he was a tenure-track faculty member;" You should be able to confirm this with an official source rather than rely on Lawson's statement. (t · c) buidhe 05:57, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Buidhe, I agree, I should be! Unfortunately, I don't think I can. I've removed the statement from the lede. It's clearly attributed in the body but I'll remove it there as well if you feel that's necessary. ezlev (user/tlk/ctrbs) 06:15, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I've also added a citation to the paragraph that was missing one. ezlev (user/tlk/ctrbs) 06:18, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I have no objection to that. Looks like the article would be OK for DYK except Mccapra has placed a notability tag on it. Notability issues should be resolved before this can be passed. (t · c) buidhe 06:38, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, Buidhe! I believe notability is established, but will happily add some more information and sources to the article if Mccapra disagrees. That won’t happen ‘till tomorrow, though. ezlev (user/tlk/ctrbs) 06:47, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Buidhe, I've added sources and removed the tag, and the page has been reviewed by another reviewer. ezlev (user/tlk/ctrbs) 19:09, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
buidhe? theleekycauldron (talkcontribs) (they/them) 19:56, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
It's already approved and if there are no further notability disputes I don't see any barrier to promotion. (t · c) buidhe 20:02, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
To T:DYK/P2

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Kenneth Lawson/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: A. C. Santacruz (talk · contribs) 19:39, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

GA review
(see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):
    b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):
    b (citations to reliable sources):
    c (OR):
    d (copyvio and plagiarism):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):
    b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

Overall:
Pass/Fail:

· · ·

Comments

Lead

I'll add more comments on the lead after I finish reviewing the rest of the article A. C. SantacruzPlease ping me! 20:34, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Early life and education

Law practice

Misc. comments

Status query

A. C. Santacruz, Ezlev, where does this nomination stand? It appears that there is more of the article to review, and two edits have been made to address issues raised in the review so far. Thank you. BlueMoonset (talk) 01:51, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

BlueMoonset, mb, I forgot to follow up with more comments. I'll add them now. A. C. SantacruzPlease ping me! 16:03, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]