GA Review

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: Sammi Brie (talk · contribs) 04:50, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Arconning (talk · contribs) 12:43, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Prose and MoS

[edit]

Lede

[edit]

History

[edit]

Funding

[edit]

Local programming

[edit]

Technical information

[edit]

Refs

[edit]
Spotchecks
[edit]

Images

[edit]

Misc.

[edit]
Good Article review progress box
Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()
3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.