The following Wikipedia contributor may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.
|
A fact from James Cantor appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 5 October 2010 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the James Cantor article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 180 days |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
He was forced out of the distribution list, in violation of their rules, and then hounded out by transphilic (or TERF-phobic? ambiguity intended) activists:
In the present culture war between science and popular appeal, the SSSS Board of Directors selected the latter. This is not the first time the SSSS Board abused their authority to silence science ...
due to his article.
He alleges censorhip, hounding and more. Nihil novi.
It seems significant and DUE in view of the ongoing culture wars worldwide, Cultural Revolution 2.0 as I would call it.
There is at least one relevant WP:RS cited there:
How to Ruin Sex Research J. Michael Bailey Archives of Sexual Behavior
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10508-019-1420-y
but I do not have inclination to search for more, update his bio and related articles (TERF? Science wars? ), and then monitor and restore it, especially after being repeatedly reverted recently on similar LB+ cum social topics.
Any takers?
Ps. What a yumny word:
gynandromorphophilic
in this ref!
My sesquipedalianophila kicks in! Zezen (talk) 18:08, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
Thanks for doing the legwork. Please monitor it then. I will take care of other areas. Zezen (talk) 05:55, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
A Media Matters article used as a source is of questionable value. A few points:
If not the whole paragraph, then the section "The removal was reportedly related to public advocacy for pedophiles, including association with the Prostasia Foundation, and advocating for pedophiles to be included as "P" under the LGBTQ umbrella" should be removed. Jeremy Malcolm (talk) 02:10, 18 November 2022 (UTC)
This “article” totally feels like a promo page. Tangamandapiou (talk) 21:01, 27 January 2024 (UTC)