GA Review

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: WikiOriginal-9 (talk · contribs) 08:53, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

Notes

[edit]

That's all I think. WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 09:21, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@BeanieFan11: Someone just changed stuff and in the navbox, so I'll have to look at this again. WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 00:03, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
information Closed with the nominator BeanieFan11's permission. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 20:15, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.