![]() | A fact from Islamic Center of Murfreesboro appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 31 August 2012 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
I'm wondering if this article should be moved to Islamic Center of Murfreesboro mosque controversy, since it deals almost exclusively with the controversy over the ICM's new mosque, rather than the ICM specifically. Bms4880 (talk) 13:20, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
The federal court's TRO expired three weeks ago. Have there been any developments since then, or did the opponents give up? Kablammo (talk) 16:41, 22 August 2012 (UTC)
The TRO was extended through Aug 15, and a hearing on the preliminary injuction is set for Aug 24. The US and Rutherford County jointly requested an extension of the TRO for another 30 days; that motion was denied today. Kablammo (talk) 18:09, 22 August 2012 (UTC)
To everybody who thinks 'USA' or 'US' is not necessary in the article - Wikipedia is an international encyclopaedia, not an American one, and the US is not the default here. We do not, in a US-centric way, assume everybody knows where Tennessee is. We provide pertinent information. A lot of readers might not know that Tennessee is a US state. We provide that information. The US is not so great that it can assume everyone knows everything about it. 86.133.210.76 (talk) 23:18, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
The picture of the historic courthouse indicating it as the site of the lawsuits surrounding the mosque needs to be removed. The historic courthouse has not been the site of court operations for over 10 years prior to the lawsuits. Parcequilfaut (talk) 05:37, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
While there was considerable controversy, with of course statements made by many politicians, the court cases are now settled. It is time to summarize the controversy and legal actions; it should not take over this entire article, even though it was extensively covered. For example, many people's statements of four years ago could be shortened or omitted; they were included because the controversy was ongoing, but it is time to shift from journalism to an encyclopedic summary, please.Parkwells (talk) 01:41, 15 February 2015 (UTC)
It would be useful to have more discussion of the Muslim community in Murfreesboro.Parkwells (talk) 01:51, 15 February 2015 (UTC)