This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
To visit the Intuitive Machines Nova-C current Talk page, please see:
To visit the Intuitive Machines Nova-C current Talk page archive index, please see:
Article is more about the missions than the Nova-C lander. Big overlap with Intuitive Machines. Maybe the list of missions should be moved to the company article ? - Rod57 (talk) 17:44, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
Intuitive Machines says IM-1 will launch on Falcon 9. This article says IM-3 will launch on Falcon 9, but isn't clear what will launch IM-2. - Rod57 (talk) 17:46, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
The article currently mentions ISRU in the Overview section. Perhaps this would be better in a new section titled "Potential use of propellants produced in-situ," as there is currently no ISRU propellant produced at any lunar lander destination. Thoughts? (sdsds - talk) 01:13, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
By convention, titles of articles that describe a type of vehicle are of the form "<make> <model>." See e.g. Boeing 747, Ford Mustang or essentially any other such article. Also, now that the flight article for the IM-1 mission has been given the name Odysseus the italics for "Nova-C" are unconventional. See Wikipedia:Naming conventions (aircraft). (sdsds - talk) 21:05, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
Hi again @Sdsds:,
Since you first proposed this a week ago, there have been no editors objecting to your proposal to move the Nova-C article as you proposed above, and there have been three editors who support it. As far as I can tell, nobody would have any problems if either one of us moved it right now. If you would like, I could move it now or you could move it now. What do you think about one of us moving it today? If you feel it would be OK, do you want to do the move yourself or would you prefer that I did it?
Thanks,
Lighthumormonger (talk) 23:05, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
Since you were the one who first proposed the move, I would think it would be well and good if you did the move. Still, if you might prefer that I do it, that would be fine with me too. I will leave that decision, as to who you would prefer to move the article, in your good hands.
Lighthumormonger (talk) 23:32, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
OK @Sdsds:,
I guess since it's been two hours with no reply I'll take that as an "OK Lighthumormonger, you can do it." I will do it and take whatever flack may come my way. If there is a next time maybe you could do it then. I just hope you might be able to back me up if I might need it. First I'm going to close this discussion, then I'm going to move the article. Here goes…
Lighthumormonger (talk) 01:45, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
The currently-linked reference for this describes only JPSS and other communications-related work, not landers. Is there a source for the multi-lander contract award? (sdsds - talk) 01:48, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
There's a subtle distinction between the terms "line" and "series." TL;DR - article lede would be better if it used series.
A (product) line includes a variety of products offered by a single supplier. That's not the case for Nova-C. A (production) line implies work items moving from station to station for assembly. We don't have sources supporting linear production (as opposed to series or batch production) of Nova-C.
Discussion? (— 𝐬𝐝𝐒𝐝𝐬 — - talk) 22:58, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
Hi @Sdsds:,
In case you might be interested, I've just linked to Intuitive Machines press kit for the IM-1 Odysseus lander. To see the link in the article, you can visit Intuitive_Machines_Nova-C#IM-1_mission, then click on the final ref at the end of the "IM-1 mission" paragraph. This should take you to a cite titled: "IM-1 Mission Summary (pg 8)."
To access the press kit directly from here you can simply click on this link:
Cheers,
Lighthumormonger (talk) 20:48, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
What are the wikipedia syntax/style guidelines for citing a media briefing telecon like https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mcukbOmiU-c ? (— 𝐬𝐝𝐒𝐝𝐬 — - talk) 21:36, 13 February 2024 (UTC)