The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Nominator: Magentic Manifestations (talk · contribs) 15:25, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Reviewer: TheNuggeteer (talk · contribs) 05:30, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
Going to review this later, good luck! 🍗TheNuggeteer🍗
05:30, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
Rate | Attribute | Review Comment |
---|---|---|
1. Well-written: | ||
1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct. | ||
1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. | Everything is okay in this criterion. | |
2. Verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check: | ||
2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline. | Looks okay. | |
2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose). | ||
2c. it contains no original research. | ||
2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism. | ||
3. Broad in its coverage: | ||
3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic. | ||
3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style). | ||
4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. | Seems okay. | |
5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. | No major reverts. | |
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio: | ||
6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content. | The images are rightly tagged and proper. | |
6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions. | All the images are relevant to the topic. | |
7. Overall assessment. | Good enough for GA, passing. |
Nothing wrong! 🍗TheNuggeteer🍗
12:42, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
the athletes required aid from various private sponsors including uniforms donated by Indo-Canadiansadd 'the' before Indo-Canadians, who from the Indo-Canadians? Expanded.
Tashi Lundup served asadd 'also' before served.
🍗TheNuggeteer🍗
12:42, 26 August 2024 (UTC)Three Indian athletes competed in the eventAdd 'including' after the sentence. As a dash has been introduced, I guess this is not necessary as it lists the only three athletes participating.
🍗TheNuggeteer🍗
12:42, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
and trained at theto
were part of the. tweaked
🍗TheNuggeteer🍗
12:42, 26 August 2024 (UTC)that they satisfiedremove 'they'. tweaked
and trained at theto
were part of the. tweaked
🍗TheNuggeteer🍗
12:42, 26 August 2024 (UTC)one for the hostschange 'for' to 'of'. "of" will not make sense here as the spot was allocated "for the hosts". I have rather removed the part itself as it is not relevant to Indian qualification. Reworded and tweaked the entire section for better readability. See if it is ok.
🍗TheNuggeteer🍗
12:42, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
🍗TheNuggeteer🍗
11:38, 28 August 2024 (UTC)Will review the rest later. 🍗TheNuggeteer🍗
12:42, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
🍗TheNuggeteer🍗
03:46, 28 August 2024 (UTC)@🍗TheNugg, I have addressed the comments. Please do let me know if you have any further comments/feedback. Thanks! Magentic Manifestations (talk) 06:08, 28 August 2024 (UTC)