GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: (CA)Giacobbe (talk · contribs) 00:47, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


What's up buddy! Article looks good from what I see, should have it done in no time! Just a heads up, most of the comments will be about grammar (I use the Grammarly software for university). Giacobbe talk 00:47, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Lead

[edit]

Overall, lead looks awesome. Giacobbe talk 14:04, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Background and writing

[edit]

Great work on the rest, just a few minor changes. Giacobbe talk 14:45, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Composition

[edit]

Very well-written man. One thing I did notice was that in the first paragraph, the word "song" is used multiple times. Maybe I'd change its use in the third line to "track", instead. Giacobbe talk 14:54, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Release and live performances

[edit]

The rest is perfect! Giacobbe talk 15:24, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Critical reception

[edit]

Great work. Giacobbe talk 15:29, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

References

[edit]

Everything looks good. Giacobbe talk 15:41, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Overall

[edit]

Great job man, just a few minor adjustments on it's a pass! Giacobbe talk 15:41, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for the quick review! I believe I have addressed your concerns accordingly Cheers, (talk) 04:55, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Awesome! It's a pass from me. Giacobbe talk 12:47, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]