This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the IBM Watson article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 90 days |
The good article status of this article is being reassessed by an individual editor to determine if the article meets the good article criteria. Please add comments to the reassessment page, but the decision to list the article as a good article should be left to the editor initiating this reassessment. Date: 16:02, 16 March 2022 (UTC) |
IBM Watson has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: November 13, 2013. (Reviewed version). |
A fact from IBM Watson appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 19 June 2010 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
A news item involving IBM Watson was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the In the news section on 17 February 2011. |
This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the ((WikiProject banner shell)) template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the ((WikiProject banner shell)) template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the ((WikiProject banner shell)) template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the ((WikiProject banner shell)) template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the ((WikiProject banner shell)) template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
The Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see WP:COIRESPONSE.
|
This is in response to the revert.[1] My point is Watson is NOT an AI. The Watson (mainframe) that played jeopardy and the variant that is used in different academic systems for research is a computer based on what IBM cals cognitive technologies. This is not to be confused with "IBM Watson" services they provide under their cloud umbrella.
References
What do you think about proposing Wikipedia editing as a challenge to IBM's Watson? Charles Juvon (talk) 15:58, 30 November 2020 (UTC)
https://www.nytimes.com/2021/07/16/technology/what-happened-ibm-watson.html Mapsax (talk) 02:50, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Actively tagged as an advertisement in one section, see the talk page for further neutrality concerns. These, and issues with updating, would need to be addressed for the article to remain a GA. (t · c) buidhe 16:05, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
The request to rename this article to IBM Watson has been carried out.
If the page title has consensus, be sure to close this discussion using ((subst:RM top|'''page moved'''.)) and ((subst:RM bottom)) and remove the ((Requested move/dated|…)) tag, or replace it with the ((subst:Requested move/end|…)) tag. |
Watson (computer) → IBM Watson – Per WP:NATURALDAB, natural disambiguations are preferred over parenthetical disambiguations. "IBM Watson" is also the name used on its official website, and is commonly used in reliable sources. InfiniteNexus (talk) 04:34, 19 June 2022 (UTC)