GA fail

I'm sorry to say that I must fail this article as it does not meet the criteria for a good article. The are sourcing problems as well as problems in the prose. Before re-nominating this article for GA in the future, follow these tips:

• Copy-edit the article. Articles need to have a strong prose without spelling/grammer errors, and this article has a few, as well as run-ons.
• Un-link the dates, as it is no longer part of Wikipedia's Manual of Style.
• Add more sources/references. Mostly the "Track Layout" section, only has one reference in the beginning, and the rest of the section remains un-sourced.

If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page. Best of luck with the article, iMatthew (talk) 14:31, 7 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]