This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
"The significance of this design is that had this aircraft entered production and been used in operations over England it would have been impossible for Allied fighters to intercept over the target, owing to its extreme high altitude performance." - unfortunately for the He 274 the quoted altitude of 14,300 m (46,920 ft) was to be exceeded by a Spitfire, in an unofficial record flight to 48,200ft flown by a Flt Lt Williams in 1943 in what I suspect was a Spitfire HF Mk IX. [1][2]
Some of the dates are D/M/Y, while others are M/D/Y. As it is about a German aircraft, and the date format for pretty well all countries is D/M/Y, If I edit all sates to be universal D/M/Y will that be acceptable? I only ask because a certain editor is stalking me and reverting my date edits. Surely they have to be one or the other and not a mixture of both? Troy von Tempest (talk) 03:35, 3 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Troy, you are absolutely correct that this article should use the D/M/Y format. Date formats should also be consistent in each article, whichever style is used. I've tagged the article for DMY, and will try to change the incorrect formats. Feel free to correct any that I miss. BilCat (talk) 04:38, 3 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]