GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Jaguar (talk · contribs) 17:57, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


I'll do this now. JAGUAR  17:57, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Initial comments

[edit]

Manoeuvres ;-D. Sorry, at least it gave me a reason to make more comments! The lead could do with a very slight expansion, and once they're all addressed then this can pass. JAGUAR  18:07, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sad thing is that I remember thinking that I needed to check the spelling of the rest of them before I could consider it done, but later totally forgot about it. Thanks for taking this one so quickly.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 19:45, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
With all of the issues clarified, this should be good to go. Usually I wouldn't mind the different spellings, but it gives me an excuse to list more comments! JAGUAR  21:04, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]