GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Miyagawa (talk · contribs) 12:25, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Grabbing this for a review. Miyagawa (talk) 12:25, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, reviewing now. Although I suspect there won't be much as your warship articles are usually of a very high quality, so anything I do find will be inherently nitpicky in nature.

@Sturmvogel 66: That's the lot. Ping me back when you've had a chance to fix those points and I'll come back and promote. Miyagawa (talk) 16:47, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the review. I've gone ahead and linked Prince Arthur like I meant to as I really don't understand why some people think that a stretch of text in blue rather than black is actually a big deal. I think that I've done everything else that was needed as well.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 19:41, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Awesome, happy to pass. Miyagawa (talk) 21:14, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Sturmvogel 66: Will give the 100 points once this passes!♦ Dr. Blofeld 13:12, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]