HMS Cordelia (1914) has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: April 2, 2016. (Reviewed version).

This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Ships This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles Military history: Maritime / British / European / World War I This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles Associated task forces: /  Maritime warfare task force British military history task force European military history task force World War I task force Wales Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Wales, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Wales on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WalesWikipedia:WikiProject WalesTemplate:WikiProject WalesWales articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article was created or improved during the "The 20,000 Challenge: UK and Ireland", which started on 20 August 2016 and is still open. You can help!

This review is transcluded from Talk:HMS Cordelia (1914)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Jaguar (talk · contribs) 11:35, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'll have this to you soon. JAGUAR  11:35, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Once again, the lead needs to be expanded to summarise the article. A couple of sentences on its career and a mention on when it was commissioned would be good (you can ignore the latter if you think it's best)
• "The ship also mounted two twin, above-water, mounts for 21 in (533 mm) torpedos" - torpedoes
• "The walls of their conning tower were 6 inches thick" - convert to millimetres
  • converted on first use.
• "... on 21 July 1913, launched on 23 February 1914, and completed in January 1915." - I think this sentence could be broken in two. ...on 21 July 1913. She was launched on 23 February 1914, and completed in January 1915. Feel free to ignore this, but I thought that the previous sentence was too long to read comfortably
  • Agreed.
• "In early August, Cordelia and her squadron" - of what year? 1915?
  • Yes, as mentioned a couple of sentences earlier.
• "Later that month, Cordelia was reduced to reserve at Devonport. By 1 May" - this is the beginning of a new section, so I lost track of what year this was. It might be best to start this with Later in February 1919, Cordelia was reduced to reserve at Devonport. By 1 May
  • It's in the immediately preceding sentence, so I don't think you're giving enough credit to the reader.
• "she recommissioned for service in the 2nd Light Cruiser Squadron in the Atlantic Fleet" - link Atlantic Fleet (United Kingdom)
  • Linked in the lede.
• "and placed in The Nore Reserve" - 'the' needs no capitalisation
• No dead links

Solid article. Once all of the above are addressed then it should have no problem passing. JAGUAR  21:16, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the quick review, hopefully all of my changes will satisfy your concerns.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 21:47, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for addressing them, I've gone through the article again and it meets the GA criteria. Well done! JAGUAR  22:14, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on HMS Cordelia (1914). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added ((dead link)) tag to https://ia700709.us.archive.org/21/items/navylistoct1917grea/navylistoct1917grea.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160401010101/https://archive.org/details/navylistfeb1919grea to https://ia700709.us.archive.org/21/items/navylistfeb1919grea/navylistfeb1919grea.pdf
• Added ((dead link)) tag to https://ia700709.us.archive.org/21/items/navylistmar1919grea/navylistmar1919grea.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160401010101/https://archive.org/details/navylistmay1919grea to https://ia700709.us.archive.org/21/items/navylistmay1919grea/navylistmay1919grea.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template ((source check)) (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:46, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]