"Awards were also presented to the engineers, mixers, and/or producers in addition to the performing artists" - you only really need either "also" or "in addition to" here, not both
"multi-instrumentalist Willie K. (born William Kahaiali'i) ..." - do we need to have both the short and long form of his name? Not a big deal at all, but it's already quite a long sentence with a lot of information, might make it a bit simpler to digest
If his full name is going to be included anywhere, I think it should be here. I am happy to remove his birth name if you feel it is unnecessary to include. --Another Believer(Talk)21:41, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
"Scott Iwasaki of Deseret News ..." - theDeseret News?
"described as "an easy-listening instrumental compilation seemingly tailored to mainland tastes."" - this could do with in-text attribution - who described it thus?
"Voting members of the Academy have also been criticized..." - it'd be helpful to know who has criticised them, ie. members of the press? Members of the music industry?
Ref currently no. 24 (Allmusic link for Treasures of Hawaiian Slack Key Guitar - this cite seems to be just to back up the chart position. If this is the case, why not just link to the "Charts & Awards" tab rather than having the note in the citation requesting the reader to click a different link (or did I miss something there)?
Spot checks show no problems with copyright violation/plagiarism or verifiability. No big issues here, I'll put it on hold to allow you to address the above issues. BelovedFreak21:10, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you so much for taking the time to conduct a review and offer feedback/suggestions. The article is better thanks to your contributions. Much appreciated! --Another Believer(Talk)21:44, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
You're welcome. It all looks good now, and was obviously a well-prepared article, so well done. Regarding Willie K's name, I just thought it was a bit of a long sentence already, no big deal. I'll leave it up to you. I think there is good reason to leave it as it is also, since we don't have an article on him yet. Otherwise, you've either fixed things or provided reasonable explanations, so I'm happy to list it as a GA.--BelovedFreak23:04, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.