This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
I think those tags should be removed for the following reasons:
1) A major contributor to this article appears to have a close connection with its subject: perhaps the original author did back in 2017, but more people have worked on this article since that time and the new text doesn't raise that suspicion.
2) This article may rely excessively on sources too closely associated with the subject, potentially preventing the article from being verifiable and neutral: the website of the consortium was removed and references listed included universities and a very top academic journal like 'Small Business Economics'. I am sure there the web has countless sites listing the use of GEM data, but it becomes a matter of using the references appropriately. Perhaps a new a section should be created listing all the major academic studies using GEM data...
3) The topic of this article may not meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines for companies and organizations: I think that GEM numbers clearly show the ongoing relevance of this project on a global scale (25 years of history, 115 countries participating, collaboration with over 500 specialists in entrepreneurship research, the involvement of some 300+ academic and research institutions, the support from more than 200 funding institutions, and recurring use of the data by the UN, the World Economic Forum, and the World Bank and the OECD).
~~~~ Mobinow (talk) 00:10, 2 July 2022 (UTC)